went to the sox yesterday cause I fell into some free standing room only tix for me and some friends/family. I've never been so bored, standing sucks, getting kicked out of random seats is embarressing and the only highlight was all my attempts to sneak on the green monster. I was so bored I actually weighed the consequinces of rushing the field. good thing that beers are $7.50 and I didnt go w/ tons of money.
Life's short. Touch Art.
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
fenway fucking sucks.
if they built a real stadium like every other team in baseball has done seating wouldnt be a problem.
"what?"
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
I disagree! We were standing room only for the no-hitter last year, it ruled! The people were die-hard and so fun! But I had a date with $ so I couldn't feel my feet by the 5th inning!
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
Waaaaa!!! I had free Red Sox tickets and I was bored waaaaa!!
If you can't enjoy a sunny Sunday afternoon at Fenway with the Sox winning a close one run ballgame I don't know what to tell you. You should be able to be amused just people watching if the moooves on the field are boring to you.
If you want a seat and cheaper beer may I suggest Fitton Field.
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
You're in the ballpark. Free. With friends and family. Watching the Sox. That's a great start.
Watch the game and you won't be bored. Or go up to the right field roof box area and you can hang around the bar and get a great view besides.
It's a boy Mrs. Walker, it's a boy...
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
whatever. the train and the subway ride was the best of the hanging with friends and family, and dont get me wrong, i really enjoy watching the sox and still do: at home, or at a bar, and probably would have enjoyed it if we had assigned seats. all i'm saying is standing room only sucked.
shit, i even put sunblock on prior to the game. the other sucky part of it was there wasnt any place to get any sun... was under the bleachers the whole game.
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
That's why they call them SRO. You takes your chances and you rolls with the punches. Yeah, the Cask or your preferred watering hole would be more comfortable, but that's really not the point. Events, by their nature, are communal endeavors. If you require certain environmental comforts (not a bad thing, by the way) to enhance that communal experience, you have to pay for it. If you just want to see a game, maybe luck into a memorable moment or 2, than SRO is the way to go. I can remember paying $75 for two seats 3 years ago in May against the Indians when it poured like Jesus' wrath and was 50 degrees to boot. Oh, well. I guess my point is these things are what you make of them, you can't expect more than a pleasant diversion if you are going to take the SRO crapshoot and after all its baseball. Let's play two!
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
hey, everytime I tie my shoelaces I think of all the poor kids in Africa that dont even have shoes.. I know how to look at the brightside of every situation.
I guess my original point was if anyone has some free standing room only tix at Fenway, dont worry about getting your inbox filled up from PM's from me. :-D
Thanks!
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
just get us to 2012, have the 100 year celebration... have the all-star game there... have a huge jerk-off fest ...invite john kerry... raise a flag... bronze a half dozen seats... do good morning america live from fenway... host oprah... have yanni play there... turn the place into a museum... bake a giant red sox cake.
then please... for the love of god...
build us a real baseball stadium.
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
I agree with you Chris in the sense that there needs to be better accessibility to the games since the popularity of the team has grown so much. I would certainly lament losing Fenway. They should keep it a functioning park for something else though.
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
i agree. i am being a little rediculous.
its not totally the park... its the seating... the park has been upgraded pretty well in the last 10 years... its getting better.
you ever sit in the infield grandstands? they are absolutely terrible, and those are 50% of the seats... not to mention the most sat in by the average fan.
they are absolutely tiny and uncomfortable. even i at 5'10 struggle to sit in them... not to mention half of them dont even face the friggin field.
they change shit evey year... add concessions, hang up balloons, paint the railings... yay... but they wont change the seating... and do you know why???
not because of the "history" or the "nostalgia" or to appease the baseball gods. because they'd lose $. if they change them... and ruin the "nostalgia" they'd have to adhere to modern day fire and safety codes which would require a complete overhaul and loss of 30-40% of the seating... its safety requirements grandfathered in from 1912... its total bullshit.
anyone whos been to gillette stadium even can dream as to what it would be like to give the best fans in the game what they deserve.
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
I completely agree. A new park would take care of all those problems. I mean, look at Camden Yards, Safeco Field, the Jake. Christ, if they can knock down Yankee Stadium (another shitty place to watch a game) they can certainly provide Boston fans a decent place to watch a game.
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
The two newer parks I have been to (Camden and Petco) are beautiful, Petco specifically. The fact that they built an old industrial building into the park itself and then gutted it and used it for box seats is genius.
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
I went to a game last month and had infield grandstand seats. I'm 6'2" and those seats were torture. I think I still have bruises on my knees from trying to squeeze them in. While some of the new parks are sweet (a summer game in Safeco is heavenly if you don't mind the non-passionate fans), some are pretty sterile (Busch in St Louis is only ok). It would be sad to lose Fenway for a sterile park.
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
Please. I was going to stay away from this thread, but come on now. I have been to a number ball parks, old and new and there is no better place in my opinion than Fenway. Nowhere else can you be in the last row and still be so close. It this one of only two neighborhood ball parks left. And it is in amazing shape. In 2001, the place was disgusting. The Red Sox did nothing to keep the place in order and they had convinced us all that there needed to be a new ball park. Since this ownership group took over, the place has been nothing less than spectacular. The facility is clean, they have add thousands of seats, they opened up the concession areas, they eliminated the 406 club, they have the concourse on Yawkey Way, etc. Yankee Stadium and Shea Stadium are dumps, with little to no up keep and they deserve to be knocked down. Fenway is in great shape and should stay. If you only complaint is trying to get a seat, too bad. Where were you before 2004 when I used to walk up and get seats whenever I felt like it? There is no place I would rather be than in Fenway any day of the week. I don't care where I am sitting/standing. All I need is a score book and some peanuts and I am in heaven.
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
Yeah but what about the wave?
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
The wave sucks.
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
yes, and that was great, but since 2004 I have a hard time getting good tickets. You think waiting in virtual waiting rooms for days on end to maybe possibly get some seats is ideal?
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
No, but what makes you think that a new stadium is the answer to that problem? The only answer to that is for the Sox to not be good. When Jacobs Field in Cleveland opened in 1994, they sold out the first 455 games there, very similar to the way Fenway is now. They did that because the Indians were a power house and at the modern peak of their popularity, much like the Sox right now. They stopped selling out when they stopped being good. Opening a new park would just mean more of the same, until the Red Sox are not a major power house or stop being so popular. If they went out and built a new stadium with 55,000 seats, like Yankee Stadium, that would be different, but then you could get seats 500 feet from home plate when ever you want and never see anything.
I still can not see what you all think will come from building a new stadium. Ease of getting tickets is not something that will be part of it.
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
maybe my logic isn't working but wouldn't more seats in a new stadium mean more accessibility a better seating plan and an easier time catching a game?
I understand affection for Fenway and the desire to keep it because it functions, it's nostalgic and does the trick. I love that place, but this attitude that any fans pre-2004 have any more to say on the subject than current fans is horseshit. You are busy yelling at the pink hats who want comfortable seats and a good view while they are actually the ones helping pay for the players that the Sox currently have.
edited to say that this isn't directed at you Tibby, just the general idea that the new fans don't have a say on this matter. I do understand your argument that a new stadium accommodates the Sox now, while they are on top.
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
I never bitched about the pink hats or said anything about being around pre 2004, other than it was easier to get tickets. I am saying that more seats may seem like it would be easier to get tickets, but every year, the team adds seats and it is no easier than before to get tickets. The craze for the Sox is wonderful and I have no issue with it being hard for me to get tickets. The fact is, new stadiums do not add more regular seating. They add more season ticket seating and luxury seating, while keeping the regular seating the same. The fact is, that as long as Fenway is selling out, they will not build. Why would they kill their demand by adding more seats?
Fact, I have no issues with Fenway selling out and how hard it is to get tickets.
Fact, Fenway is my favorite place to watch baseball because you are so close to the field. I have sat in just about ever section in Fenway and unless there is a poll in your face (one major flaw) I find it hard to complain.
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
fenways quaintness is not irreplaceable. its not what we are talking about here.
go to camden, or yankee stadium or philly... all are under 6 hours away. not making fenway half as accessible and accommodating of that is a slap in the face to all of boston in my opinion.
maybe im bitter, but i go to 15-25 games a year and test my threshold for "virtual waiting room" refresh patience doing so to sit on a piece of wood. it should not be that difficult and unaccommodating to enjoy it HERE.
look at the rest of the park? if they could re-do all of the seats and still squeeze 40K in there they would... but they know they cant and they don't have to. thats what pisses me off.
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
Thibbs I hear ya. Some seats at Fenway are great, others, I don't think are.
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
You all can complain as much as you want, but the fact is, there is no other ownership in all of Major League Baseball that has been more accommodating and accessible to fans than the Red Sox. We also have to remember that this is a business first and foremost so they have every right to do what is best for their business.
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
just look at PNC park... its fucking amazing. and thats almost 40K...
theres no shortness of "closeness" in any seat in that place... and its built on the smallest sq footage of any ballpark in america... the thing practically hangs into the bay
its the future. it doesnt have to look like yankee stadium to add 20-30% more seats (and thereby opportunities for tickets).
fenway SHOULD be 50-60K... it hosts sox fans from all of new england. it aint happening on yawkee way unless they totally overhall.
we need a new stadium.
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
so a larger venue with parking that the venue can make money on and more seats wouldn't be good business? come on. I was buying your argument to keep it because they may lose fans when they stop winning, but bad for business?
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
not even close...
the new york yankees are.. by FAR... and have been for the last 30 years. the sox are just trying to catch up because they realize it works.
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
Whoa, whoa, whoa! Yankee Stadium? Accommadating and accessible? The place is a sold-out shit hole! The only thing it has going for it is parking.
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
Fenway at 50-60K capacity? Ludicrous. There isn't the current infrastructure to handle that type of volume - roads, parking, etc. Then you'd all be bitching about how it took you 3 hours to get out of the parking lot and get back to Worcester. I think about 45,000 would be a good volume for a Boston ballpark should it ever come about (and quite honestly, I think it's unlikely).
And yes, the infield grandstand seats are tiny - they're built for 1912 -size people. We sat in the right filed roof boxes last Monday and the new seating is quite comfortable, and still provided a great view. The new Sox management has made positive changes on an order of magnitude - if you don't like it, there's always the couch and the fridge - it's a lot cheaper, but you miss that sense of the event.
Yeah I'm one of the old fart "pre-2004" fans (saw my first game in 1967 you puppies) and thus I have a longer perspective on this. I used to see almost 50 games a year in the "old days" ( I remember $3 bleacher seats) and these days I am lucky to see 2 a year. Winning breeds interest, winning championships breeds massive interest - it's all demand and supply. I hate the fact that I can't get to the park, but I'd rather have a championship calibre team to root for.
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
I second that emotion, John. First game @ Fenway, late July, 1969.
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
the whole thing is different now and if you want a championship team you need to generate championship money which means you need to accommodate your fans.
I am not knocking Fenway but it was built for a different era of the sport. My first game was sometime around '86 so take my opinion with a grain of salt.
that said, anytime you guys want to put on some gloves and swing a bat, I'm game. :)
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
a rumble with gloves and bats or baseball?
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
I'm in!
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
the more I think about this the less I even care about it. Much like concerts in big stadiums, I simply don't enjoy events like this as much as I used too. I go a few times a year now and that is fine. It's cool that such a old building is functioning still.
Go Sox
Re: Red Sox + Standing Room Only = Sucks
Um... I think that's the first thing to go!
Actually I agree. I am happy we are immersed in such tradition and history, I get there enough.