well, just in general, what is his appeal? I often find people with very good taste like him yet his voice is contrary to the honest and unaffected voices that these people tend to gravitate towards. I enjoy many singers that have unique voices, yet his is comical to me. His music is excellent and I have read his lyrics and I like those as well, but I just can't get past the voice. It seems fake, is it? I understand the argument that there may not be such a thing as fake and his choice to sing the way he does is his craft, if that is the explanation, then I am back to not understanding the appeal.
I remember finding my fathers copy of "Small Change" when I was very young and liking the cover. I put the album on and that is the day I started not 'getting' Tom Waits.
I honestly want to like him, I feel like I am missing out on something special.
On his voice, a couple of thoughts. First, if you've ever heard him speak, he has a very strange voice--it's hard to describe, but it's definitely not the voice you hear in the singing. And a couple of songs that I know of are sung more in that voice: "I'll Take New York," from Frank's Wild Years, is a good example. And to be honest with you, to me that (perhaps) more natural voice has a very grating, annoying sound to it. So one possibility might be that he projects that deeper voice as a way to give himself a different sound, and also to allow him to project with more power in lower registers.
However, Waits also tends to write about characters or from the perspective of characters who are at the fringes of society, down and out, etc., and that voice perhaps rings more true to those characters--always smoky and a little drunk. Obviously Waits is an actor as well--and the CD Frank's Wild Years was staged in Chicago--and I think his use of that voice bears comparison to what an actor might do, using it to put himself more firmly in the world of his characters.
Which leads to the larger point about Waits. He is the perfect example of someone who can write perfect, brilliant rock songs--and the many artists who have covered his work (from Bruce Sprinsteen doing "Jersey Girl" to Rod Stewart doing "Downtown Train") could testify to that--but who always pushes himself and his songs in new directions. He does this with instrumentation, first of all--every instrument on the planet has been used by him in some song, I'm sure. He does it with song structure as well, and with genre--he has spoken-word poems, concept albums, etc.
So on every Tom Wait album you will have a handful of songs that are just incredible, beautiful rock songs--on Rain Dogs it would be "Downtown Train," "Hang Down Your Head," and maybe "Blind Love"--and then lots of other kinds of songs, most of which are doing different kinds of things.
This hearkens back to our Tom Petty debate. If you prefer artists that focus on writing great rock songs, Waits is not going to be your man--or at least you'll only like about a quarter of his catalogue. If you like artists that experiment and push the boundaries of the genre, then I think he belongs near the very top of the list of great rock musicians.
Thanks for the response Jim, I appreciate it. I am not trying to bait anyone or bash TW. I just know a lot of people with good taste like him and I wanted to hear their perspective.
I didn't mean you were "baiting" people in a negative sense, Duncan--I just meant I'll take up the challenge.
Anyway, here's the crux of the matter--brilliant song, stripped down to its barest elements, but with Waits giving it the fullest raspy-throat treatment he has:
One other note about Waits as a performer--he's legendary for wrapping his songs, in live performances, in long and elaborate stories. That too seems to support this idea that his songs are almost like dramatic monologues spoken by characters, and that may be again the reason for the voice projection.
I can't say that helped me much. They are good songs, believe me, I have listened to him a lot, even covering I Don't Want to Grow Up years ago in a band I was in. I will have to go back and listen to some albums I have with some of the thoughts you have shared about him. Does anyone have any interviews with him that ask him about his voice?
Do you feel his voice is any different than the metal singers that uses a similar sound?
Personally, I enjoy Tom Waits. I like the songs, the style, his voice. I think of his voice as I think of Dylan's voice- it is all part of the schtick. Like Dylan, Waits is playing a character that is this song and dance man. It is the persona that he uses to get his music across. The voice plays into the persona. That's how I see it anyway.
...Pitchfork: In your artist's statement for the new record, you say that your voice is really your instrument, which certainly seems true to anyone who has ever heard your records. Some of my favorite singers are the ones who sound a little out of control. Are you ever surprised or offended by what your voice can or cannot do?
Tom Waits: If you're still pushing the envelope and wanting to find out what this baby can do, or if you're still trying to imitate things-- most people start out by imitating. Slowly you develop your own voice. I like vocal word stuff. But I don't always write with an instrument, I usually write a capella. It's more like drawing in the air with your fingers. It's closest to the choreography of a bee. You're freer. You have no frets to constrict you, there are no frets on your voice, and that's a good feeling. So for composing melody, it's something you can do anywhere.
Pitchfork: Did you always know you wanted your voice to sound a certain way?
Tom Waits: I talked to Robert Siegel, the newscaster on NPR, and he said that most announcers and people in radio, they want their voices to sound older. Because a lot of the news you're delivering is very serious and very heavy, and you don't want to sound like a little kid talking about how thirty-three people were killed in a roadside bomb. You have to compose your voice and your whole demeanor so that it's situated to give weight, dignity, and gravity to all the things you're saying. You want the same thing for your voice when you're a singer. You want your voice and how you're approaching it to suit the material.
Pitchfork: There is a rich and wonderful American history of tough, scrappy songwriters-- everyone from Ramblin' Jack Elliott to Bob Dylan-- compulsively mythologizing themselves, inventing backstories, changing their names, developing personas to work alongside songs. Is there a Tom Waits mythology?
Tom Waits: I'm sure there is. The fact is most of the things that people know about me are made up. My own life is backstage. So what you "know" about me is only what I allowed you to know about me. So it's like a ventriloquist act. And it's also a way of safely keeping your personal life out of your business. Which is healthy and essential. I'm not one of those people the tabloids chase around. You have to put off that smell-- it's like blood in the water for a shark. And they know it, and they know that you've also agreed. And I'm not one of those. I make stuff up. There's nothing that you can say that will mean the same thing once it's been repeated. We're all making leaner versions of stories. Before there was recording, everything was subject to the folk process. And we were all part of composing in the evolution and the migration of songs. We all reached out, and they all passed through our hands at some point. You dropped a verse or changed the gender or cleaned up a verse for your kids or added something more appropriate for your community. Anything that says "Traditional," it's "Hey, I wrote that, I'm part of that." Just like when a joke reaches you-- how did it reach you? If you could go back and retrace it, that would be fascinating.
See, I really only like Tom Waits for how he lives as a performer/artist, not for his art. I've rarely been moved by his stuff, except a live version of the old standard, "Summertime," culled from a '70s ACL performance.
When I listen to TW, I am not listieng to him the same way I would listen to other, more popular music performers. His music is more like experiencing a play or dramtic work. Some of his somgs remind me of sort of an extreme minimalistic operetta, if you will. I can't explain it it just takes me there (where ever there is). That is his artistry, I guess.
Waits overall performance presentation is not just about musicical elements, polished vocal acrobatics, fancy production tricks (processing), or mass appeal.
He is also a performance artist. TW has a unique sensativity and talent to blend his natural voice, the imagery of his exquisite lyric/poetry, and sense of raw emotion, which allows the honesty of his message, or simply the work, shine through. To me anyway.
I think that's exactly the right way to think about Waits, and articulates what I was trying to say before, but not as well. It might be best to think about what he does as performance art, which incorporates visual elements, poetry, the stories he tells, the weird instruments, the voice, and so on. I generally find that if I'm writing or grading papers and a Tom Waits song comes on, I have to either skip it or stop and just listen, because it won't just float over me like lots of other things.
Yeah, I can kind of see both sides for liking/disliking Tom Waits. Honestly, sometimes I can't get past his voice. However, a couple of his albums - my favorites being The Heart of Saturday Night, and Closing Time - are incredible albums. Maybe too, I just like the piano playing and idea of sitting around drinking whiskey playing sad songs all night. I'm gonna go listen to him right now....
Duncan, has your opinion of him changed either way from reading what you posted? I for one love his work, but I've been told by some that I have shitty taste in music too...
I'm out getting my abs airbrushed on...leave a message
Here's a few paragraphs on the subject of both his voice and instrumentation from the Wikipedia entry on him. The point about your fingers going to familiar places is really fascinating, and I think applies then to his voice as well. The different ways he uses his voice, I would understand this as saying, are similar to his philosophy of using different instruments. In any case, you see in these paragraphs and the ones that Duncan posted a guy who has thought really deeply about music, and about the choices he is making: ------------ Waits had earlier played either piano or guitar, but he began tiring of these instruments, saying, "Your hands are like dogs, going to the same places they've been. You have to be careful when playing is no longer in the mind but in the fingers, going to happy places. You have to break them of their habits or you don't explore, you only play what is confident and pleasing. I'm learning to break those habits by playing instruments I know absolutely nothing about, like a bassoon or a waterphone."[15]
The instrumentation and orchestration in these and later albums were often quite eclectic.[15] Waits' self-described "Junkyard Orchestra" included wheezing pump organs, clattering percussion (sometimes reminiscent of the music of Harry Partch), bleary horn sections (often featuring Ralph Carney playing in the style of brass bands or soul music), nearly atonal guitar (perhaps best typified by Marc Ribot's contributions) and obsolete instruments (many of Waits' albums have featured a damaged, unpredictable Chamberlin, and more recent albums have included the little-used Stroh violin).
Along with a new instrumental approach, Waits gradually altered his singing style to sound less like the late-night crooner of the 70s, instead adopting a number of techniques: a gravelly sound reminiscent of Howlin' Wolf, a booming, feral bark, or a strained, nearly shrieking falsetto Waits jokingly describes as his Prince voice. Tom Moon describes Waits' voice as a "broad-spectrum assault weapon".[16] -------------------
If you listen to the song "Hang Down Your Head," off Rain Dogs--download it, and if you don't like it, I'll send you a check for 99 cents--I think you hear there a perfect example of the voice matching itself to the content of the lyrics and the rhythm of the tune.
Waits talked about his voice as an instrument on Fresh Air a while back... the interview associated with the release of "Orphans," I believe.
I am someone who did not care for him at all when I first heard him, and now Waits is easily in my top 5 most indispensible artists. I love his voice. He is a deft lyricist and the tonal qualities of his albums are incredible... this is a guy who is really capable of capturing the sound of the space in which he is performing.
Perhaps most importantly, he is getting better with age, and the rusty pseudo-pre-rock stuff will never grow inappropriate to him.
I'll share one of my favorite vocal performances of his, a live version of an old hymn.. it's his voice at its most guttural, but it goes with the tune:
I'm not familiar with Tom Waits at all--in fact I always thought he was some kind of joke or a Captain Beefheart type that people namedropped to earn their "hipster" wings--but this thread has peaked my interest. Where should one start one's first dabbling of Mr. Waits?
I like some TW. Closing time is a good album for the "casual fan" On a separate note, Duncan I know what you mean about trying to uderstand or get "it" I feel the same way sometimes about "ok computer" I loved "the bends" but can not get into "ok computer" or "kid a" for that matter.
I listened a little last night and I think that I just appreciate the style. I can hear the interesting music but I just don't love the sound. I will keep trying, this thread has been great just to hear why people like what they like.
There was a sound in some of the stuff I listened to last night that reminded me of what I like about Los Lobos. Strange sounds, a feeling of the environment they are playing in or at least what they want you to believe they are playing in. There is a strong storytelling element to both also. Kiko and the Lavender Moon would be something I could hear coming from Tom Waits without as much of the Latin feel.
The big difference for me is that I love Los Lobos.
Tom Waits is one of those artists or bands (like Roxy Music) that the songs will be playing at a party in the background and you'll have like 6 beers in you, a pretty decent buzz, and maybe you'll have a couple hits offa spliff, and you'll be going like "oh man, this song is really fucking good", then you'll go up to all your friends and say, "hey man, this song is really fucking good, who is this?", then they'll say, "Tom Waits" and you'll say, "man I have to get me some of that Tom Waits stuff", then when you go to the record store you buy like all other shit that was more important.
Kiko rules! I love that Mellotron. And I know what you mean, Duncan. Both Los Lobos and Waits seem to try to push your buttons by including nontraditional sounds (moreso on that Latin Playboys stuff). Not just odd instruments, but strange tone and effect modifications. For me, it's hit or miss. Sometimes I cringe at them, sometimes I like them. Ususally if there's more - good lyrics, some neat instrumentation - I listen long enough to see the weird stuff as Brilliant! Genius! Way ahead of its time! Otherwise, I dismiss it.
I do love Kiko as well, and that comparison seems right on.
Back up a couple of posts, it would be in that state of having drank a six pack and taken a few hits that you would be most appreciative of the video of "I Don't Wanna Grow Up," which has to be one of the more weird and disturbing videos you'll ever see. This is also a great song to introduce you to Tom Waits if you don't know him:
Re: Tom Waits
Explain what?
http://www.myspace.com/hatondrinking
Wednesdays at Nick's @ 8:00 pm.
Re: Tom Waits
Quote:
well, just in general, what is his appeal? I often find people with very good taste like him yet his voice is contrary to the honest and unaffected voices that these people tend to gravitate towards. I enjoy many singers that have unique voices, yet his is comical to me. His music is excellent and I have read his lyrics and I like those as well, but I just can't get past the voice. It seems fake, is it? I understand the argument that there may not be such a thing as fake and his choice to sing the way he does is his craft, if that is the explanation, then I am back to not understanding the appeal.
I remember finding my fathers copy of "Small Change" when I was very young and liking the cover. I put the album on and that is the day I started not 'getting' Tom Waits.
I honestly want to like him, I feel like I am missing out on something special.
Re: Tom Waits
All right, I'll take the bait on this one.
On his voice, a couple of thoughts. First, if you've ever heard him speak, he has a very strange voice--it's hard to describe, but it's definitely not the voice you hear in the singing. And a couple of songs that I know of are sung more in that voice: "I'll Take New York," from Frank's Wild Years, is a good example. And to be honest with you, to me that (perhaps) more natural voice has a very grating, annoying sound to it. So one possibility might be that he projects that deeper voice as a way to give himself a different sound, and also to allow him to project with more power in lower registers.
However, Waits also tends to write about characters or from the perspective of characters who are at the fringes of society, down and out, etc., and that voice perhaps rings more true to those characters--always smoky and a little drunk. Obviously Waits is an actor as well--and the CD Frank's Wild Years was staged in Chicago--and I think his use of that voice bears comparison to what an actor might do, using it to put himself more firmly in the world of his characters.
Which leads to the larger point about Waits. He is the perfect example of someone who can write perfect, brilliant rock songs--and the many artists who have covered his work (from Bruce Sprinsteen doing "Jersey Girl" to Rod Stewart doing "Downtown Train") could testify to that--but who always pushes himself and his songs in new directions. He does this with instrumentation, first of all--every instrument on the planet has been used by him in some song, I'm sure. He does it with song structure as well, and with genre--he has spoken-word poems, concept albums, etc.
So on every Tom Wait album you will have a handful of songs that are just incredible, beautiful rock songs--on Rain Dogs it would be "Downtown Train," "Hang Down Your Head," and maybe "Blind Love"--and then lots of other kinds of songs, most of which are doing different kinds of things.
This hearkens back to our Tom Petty debate. If you prefer artists that focus on writing great rock songs, Waits is not going to be your man--or at least you'll only like about a quarter of his catalogue. If you like artists that experiment and push the boundaries of the genre, then I think he belongs near the very top of the list of great rock musicians.
Re: Tom Waits
Thanks for the response Jim, I appreciate it. I am not trying to bait anyone or bash TW. I just know a lot of people with good taste like him and I wanted to hear their perspective.
Re: Tom Waits
I didn't mean you were "baiting" people in a negative sense, Duncan--I just meant I'll take up the challenge.
Anyway, here's the crux of the matter--brilliant song, stripped down to its barest elements, but with Waits giving it the fullest raspy-throat treatment he has:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8v5pwu1O1MA&feature=related
One other note about Waits as a performer--he's legendary for wrapping his songs, in live performances, in long and elaborate stories. That too seems to support this idea that his songs are almost like dramatic monologues spoken by characters, and that may be again the reason for the voice projection.
Re: Tom Waits
I can't say that helped me much. They are good songs, believe me, I have listened to him a lot, even covering I Don't Want to Grow Up years ago in a band I was in. I will have to go back and listen to some albums I have with some of the thoughts you have shared about him. Does anyone have any interviews with him that ask him about his voice?
Do you feel his voice is any different than the metal singers that uses a similar sound?
Re: Tom Waits
Personally, I enjoy Tom Waits. I like the songs, the style, his voice. I think of his voice as I think of Dylan's voice- it is all part of the schtick. Like Dylan, Waits is playing a character that is this song and dance man. It is the persona that he uses to get his music across. The voice plays into the persona.
That's how I see it anyway.
Re: Tom Waits
Good read
http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/feature/39683-interview-tom-waits
...Pitchfork: In your artist's statement for the new record, you say that your voice is really your instrument, which certainly seems true to anyone who has ever heard your records. Some of my favorite singers are the ones who sound a little out of control. Are you ever surprised or offended by what your voice can or cannot do?
Tom Waits: If you're still pushing the envelope and wanting to find out what this baby can do, or if you're still trying to imitate things-- most people start out by imitating. Slowly you develop your own voice. I like vocal word stuff. But I don't always write with an instrument, I usually write a capella. It's more like drawing in the air with your fingers. It's closest to the choreography of a bee. You're freer. You have no frets to constrict you, there are no frets on your voice, and that's a good feeling. So for composing melody, it's something you can do anywhere.
Pitchfork: Did you always know you wanted your voice to sound a certain way?
Tom Waits: I talked to Robert Siegel, the newscaster on NPR, and he said that most announcers and people in radio, they want their voices to sound older. Because a lot of the news you're delivering is very serious and very heavy, and you don't want to sound like a little kid talking about how thirty-three people were killed in a roadside bomb. You have to compose your voice and your whole demeanor so that it's situated to give weight, dignity, and gravity to all the things you're saying. You want the same thing for your voice when you're a singer. You want your voice and how you're approaching it to suit the material.
Pitchfork: There is a rich and wonderful American history of tough, scrappy songwriters-- everyone from Ramblin' Jack Elliott to Bob Dylan-- compulsively mythologizing themselves, inventing backstories, changing their names, developing personas to work alongside songs. Is there a Tom Waits mythology?
Tom Waits: I'm sure there is. The fact is most of the things that people know about me are made up. My own life is backstage. So what you "know" about me is only what I allowed you to know about me. So it's like a ventriloquist act. And it's also a way of safely keeping your personal life out of your business. Which is healthy and essential. I'm not one of those people the tabloids chase around. You have to put off that smell-- it's like blood in the water for a shark. And they know it, and they know that you've also agreed. And I'm not one of those. I make stuff up. There's nothing that you can say that will mean the same thing once it's been repeated. We're all making leaner versions of stories. Before there was recording, everything was subject to the folk process. And we were all part of composing in the evolution and the migration of songs. We all reached out, and they all passed through our hands at some point. You dropped a verse or changed the gender or cleaned up a verse for your kids or added something more appropriate for your community. Anything that says "Traditional," it's "Hey, I wrote that, I'm part of that." Just like when a joke reaches you-- how did it reach you? If you could go back and retrace it, that would be fascinating.
...
Re: Tom Waits
See, I really only like Tom Waits for how he lives as a performer/artist, not for his art. I've rarely been moved by his stuff, except a live version of the old standard, "Summertime," culled from a '70s ACL performance.
Oh, and that quote I posted to the other thread.
http://www.hatondrinkingwine.com
Re: Tom Waits
When I listen to TW, I am not listieng to him the same way I would listen to other, more popular music performers. His music is more like experiencing a play or dramtic work. Some of his somgs remind me of sort of an extreme minimalistic operetta, if you will. I can't explain it it just takes me there (where ever there is). That is his artistry, I guess.
Waits overall performance presentation is not just about musicical elements, polished vocal acrobatics, fancy production tricks (processing), or mass appeal.
He is also a performance artist. TW has a unique sensativity and talent to blend his natural voice, the imagery of his exquisite lyric/poetry, and sense of raw emotion, which allows the honesty of his message, or simply the work, shine through. To me anyway.
Re: Tom Waits
I think that's exactly the right way to think about Waits, and articulates what I was trying to say before, but not as well. It might be best to think about what he does as performance art, which incorporates visual elements, poetry, the stories he tells, the weird instruments, the voice, and so on. I generally find that if I'm writing or grading papers and a Tom Waits song comes on, I have to either skip it or stop and just listen, because it won't just float over me like lots of other things.
Re: Tom Waits
Yeah, I can kind of see both sides for liking/disliking Tom Waits. Honestly, sometimes I can't get past his voice. However, a couple of his albums - my favorites being The Heart of Saturday Night, and Closing Time - are incredible albums. Maybe too, I just like the piano playing and idea of sitting around drinking whiskey playing sad songs all night. I'm gonna go listen to him right now....
Re: Tom Waits
Duncan, has your opinion of him changed either way from reading what you posted? I for one love his work, but I've been told by some that I have shitty taste in music too...
I'm out getting my abs airbrushed on...leave a message
Re: Tom Waits
Here's a few paragraphs on the subject of both his voice and instrumentation from the Wikipedia entry on him. The point about your fingers going to familiar places is really fascinating, and I think applies then to his voice as well. The different ways he uses his voice, I would understand this as saying, are similar to his philosophy of using different instruments. In any case, you see in these paragraphs and the ones that Duncan posted a guy who has thought really deeply about music, and about the choices he is making:
------------
Waits had earlier played either piano or guitar, but he began tiring of these instruments, saying, "Your hands are like dogs, going to the same places they've been. You have to be careful when playing is no longer in the mind but in the fingers, going to happy places. You have to break them of their habits or you don't explore, you only play what is confident and pleasing. I'm learning to break those habits by playing instruments I know absolutely nothing about, like a bassoon or a waterphone."[15]
The instrumentation and orchestration in these and later albums were often quite eclectic.[15] Waits' self-described "Junkyard Orchestra" included wheezing pump organs, clattering percussion (sometimes reminiscent of the music of Harry Partch), bleary horn sections (often featuring Ralph Carney playing in the style of brass bands or soul music), nearly atonal guitar (perhaps best typified by Marc Ribot's contributions) and obsolete instruments (many of Waits' albums have featured a damaged, unpredictable Chamberlin, and more recent albums have included the little-used Stroh violin).
Along with a new instrumental approach, Waits gradually altered his singing style to sound less like the late-night crooner of the 70s, instead adopting a number of techniques: a gravelly sound reminiscent of Howlin' Wolf, a booming, feral bark, or a strained, nearly shrieking falsetto Waits jokingly describes as his Prince voice. Tom Moon describes Waits' voice as a "broad-spectrum assault weapon".[16]
-------------------
If you listen to the song "Hang Down Your Head," off Rain Dogs--download it, and if you don't like it, I'll send you a check for 99 cents--I think you hear there a perfect example of the voice matching itself to the content of the lyrics and the rhythm of the tune.
Re: Tom Waits
Waits talked about his voice as an instrument on Fresh Air a while back... the interview associated with the release of "Orphans," I believe.
I am someone who did not care for him at all when I first heard him, and now Waits is easily in my top 5 most indispensible artists. I love his voice. He is a deft lyricist and the tonal qualities of his albums are incredible... this is a guy who is really capable of capturing the sound of the space in which he is performing.
Perhaps most importantly, he is getting better with age, and the rusty pseudo-pre-rock stuff will never grow inappropriate to him.
I'll share one of my favorite vocal performances of his, a live version of an old hymn.. it's his voice at its most guttural, but it goes with the tune:
http://www.sanction.org/angels.mp3
Re: Tom Waits
I'm not familiar with Tom Waits at all--in fact I always thought he was some kind of joke or a Captain Beefheart type that people namedropped to earn their "hipster" wings--but this thread has peaked my interest. Where should one start one's first dabbling of Mr. Waits?
I wasn't aware that stipper is actually Elvira...
Re: Tom Waits
I'm sure we'll all have different responses to this, but I would start with the CD Rain Dogs.
Re: Tom Waits
I like some TW. Closing time is a good album for the "casual fan"
On a separate note, Duncan I know what you mean about trying to uderstand or get "it" I feel the same way sometimes about "ok computer" I loved "the bends" but can not get into "ok computer" or "kid a" for that matter.
Re: Tom Waits
And if you want to get your "wings" on Beefheart, locate "Drive-in Restaurant." It's wild, bizarre, and amazing.
Re: Tom Waits
I listened a little last night and I think that I just appreciate the style. I can hear the interesting music but I just don't love the sound. I will keep trying, this thread has been great just to hear why people like what they like.
There was a sound in some of the stuff I listened to last night that reminded me of what I like about Los Lobos. Strange sounds, a feeling of the environment they are playing in or at least what they want you to believe they are playing in. There is a strong storytelling element to both also. Kiko and the Lavender Moon would be something I could hear coming from Tom Waits without as much of the Latin feel.
The big difference for me is that I love Los Lobos.
Re: Tom Waits
Rain Dogs into Bone Machine into Mule Variations runs a nice gamut of his stylings.
Re: Tom Waits
Tom Waits is one of those artists or bands (like Roxy Music) that the songs will be playing at a party in the background and you'll have like 6 beers in you, a pretty decent buzz, and maybe you'll have a couple hits offa spliff, and you'll be going like "oh man, this song is really fucking good", then you'll go up to all your friends and say, "hey man, this song is really fucking good, who is this?", then they'll say, "Tom Waits" and you'll say, "man I have to get me some of that Tom Waits stuff", then when you go to the record store you buy like all other shit that was more important.
http://elbrendel.blogspot.com/
Re: Tom Waits
Kiko rules! I love that Mellotron. And I know what you mean, Duncan. Both Los Lobos and Waits seem to try to push your buttons by including nontraditional sounds (moreso on that Latin Playboys stuff). Not just odd instruments, but strange tone and effect modifications. For me, it's hit or miss. Sometimes I cringe at them, sometimes I like them. Ususally if there's more - good lyrics, some neat instrumentation - I listen long enough to see the weird stuff as Brilliant! Genius! Way ahead of its time! Otherwise, I dismiss it.
Re: Tom Waits
I do love Kiko as well, and that comparison seems right on.
Back up a couple of posts, it would be in that state of having drank a six pack and taken a few hits that you would be most appreciative of the video of "I Don't Wanna Grow Up," which has to be one of the more weird and disturbing videos you'll ever see. This is also a great song to introduce you to Tom Waits if you don't know him:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzKiqk2iynY