Perfect Imperfection: Flawed bands that we love anyway

Matt's picture

Embroiled in all the chat about music and bands and recordings and songs, I started thinking about bands that I love - but not completely.

For instance, Phish. I have a sort of love/hate thing with them. I can listen to their jams for eons on end. I love their live ensemble play. I love how they are like modern, smart, spoiled kids with the freedom to do exactly whatever they please. I love Trey's playing - he's beyond human: great fingers, great ears, open mind.

What I hate is most of their songs. After "Pictures of Nectar," I can't even listen to the other CD's. Songs, like "Silent in the Morning," "Story of the Ghost," "AC/DC Bag," "Harry Hood," and the whole Gamehenge thing, make me puke.

When I first heard "Reba," I thought, Wow! Listen to the crazy orchestration and wordplay, and the funny chorus. After a while, though, it was fast forward to the jam, which is sublime usually.

How about a list of bands that succeed despite obvious flaws - in musicianship, insight, lyrical skill, etc. Or, is it all or none: a full complement of talent, or go home?

Jim's picture

Re: Perfect Imperfection: Flawed bands that we love anyway

I have this same feeling about REM, though I'm sure others may (violently) disagree. REM was the first real band I listened to and fell in love with; they were my first concert as well. An older neighbor kid took me and a friend to see them right after their first album came out in a very tiny venue in Cleveland--I was like in eighth grade. I had no idea how special it was at the time. And I kept on buying their CDs, and playing them to death, right up until the one that had "Losing My Religion" on it, whatever that one was. I love that song, but at that point I started to get annoyed by Michael Stipe as a lyricist, and I've been kind of off and on again about REM ever since.

Again, just my opinion, but I think Michael Stipe makes a mistake that many student writers make, and lots of bad poets make--he confuses obscurity for profundity. In other words, he writes strange and confusing lyrics, which might mean something to him, but not much to the rest of us, and because they're hard to understand we all assume they're deep, and we ponder them and think he's a genius. I pondered his lyrics for a long time, and eventually started to wonder if the lyrics weren't really all that deep--maybe they were just confusing and silly--i.e, "What's the Frequency, Kenneth?" (and I know the back story behind this song--I still don't think much of it lyrically, though I love the music).

It doesn't help for me that he likes to play the beatnik, and seems to cultivate this image--the beret, etc. So while I still love their music, and they were a huge influence on lots of bands, and were a real source of good music during a time when lots of bad music was being played on the radio--well, despite all that, I don't listen to them much anymore.


http://www.myspace.com/hatondrinking

Wednesdays at Nick's @ 8:00 pm.

gaberollins's picture

Re: Perfect Imperfection: Flawed bands that we love anyway

The first band that comes to mind is Guided By Voices, who have many flaws, but were still absolutely kick ass.