I just have to make this comment as unpopular as it may be. I have been to all but one of the Green Street music series shows (i missed the Police/Clash show) and I have to say that I find the whole thing a bit redundant. There are a great many people in this city and beyond with more talent an ability than a lot of the people you parade across that stage. I will give the "band" their due. They have all done quite well at reproducing the music beautifully and acurately. However the singing leaves a lot to be desired. Can no one hear the terrible pitch problems with some of these guys??? Hey attitude and a rock n roll stance is all well and good but aside from the guy from vibrotica, and sometimes (not always) the guy from huck I haven't heard a lot of great singing going on! don't get me wrong It's a lot of fun to hear these songs and I pay my money but it's like the same 10 people over and over again. Whats' the deal!!!
Re: 70's AM gold
The deal is this, not enough people are willing to give honest, albeit unpopular, feedback in this town like you just did.
Thank you,
The Management
Re: 70's AM gold
I've only been to one of these -- the Rolling Stones edition -- and thought it was pretty good for the 10 minutes I stayed. Had to leave because there were 300 people in the place and I couldn't breath, let alone get a beer.
It sounded good and the vibe was like a big party. I wouldn't expect note-perfect renditions, especially since as you mention there's only a few people locally with truly good voices.
Generally speaking about the GSMS, I am not a fan of the concept. "A celebration of the music" is what I constantly hear it described as. OK, fine. But too close to karaoke for me.
Standard disclaimer here:
"Do not take my opinion as any slight against the hard work/good faith/nice asses of the people who participate. I support the scene, or at least used to before I got old and my band broke up."
Re: 70's AM gold
Quote:
I wont get involved too much in this as I have played drums for 5 out of the 7 of them and I am biased. I will point out in regards to the Karaoke comment, that since the dawn of music people have performed other peoples work. Karaoke is very different than this. You would not go see Joe Cocker play and accuse him of Karaoke. It "IS" a celebration of music and many of the participants do not have the opportunity to play in front of 300 people with their original acts. This is a good way for people to expose themselves. SO many people know about Craig Rawding and thus Vibrotica as a result of these. Also there is nothing preventing any of the 50+ participants from leaving stacks of flyers and cds and whatever on the stage, or giving them from the stage or leaving them at the bar for those 300 to take. It is only the limits of the imaginations of the performers that prevents these shows from really helping them later on.
I think that what oneoftheboys is saying is more of a take on the talent itself which is perfectly fine. I agree that the singing can sometimes be sour. We are always trying to get the best that we can. There are many solutions for anyone who doesn't like the GSMS, if anyone needs them just let me know.
ps. technically the AM Gold show was not a GSMS show. For the record :-)
www.duncanarsenault.com
Re: 70's AM gold
Please don't misunderstand. I feel that the people involved in these events are for the most part quite good. It seems a lot of detail and attention is paid to the quality MUSIC but not so much the quality of the singers. If it is so important to get he music right should'nt the singers be able to sing. I'd much rather hear two or three really good singers than a parade of not so good ones. I don't agree that it is Karaoke but I do feel like I'm hearing some perfomers that ought to go back in the wood shed for a while. Overall the shows are fun and seem to draw all walks of life. It just appears (and this is just an opinion. I don't claim to know what it takes to put a show like this together) that 90% of the participants are the same each time. Maybe who ever puts these together should look for some new blood?
I'm not trying to piss any one off here. If I hated this stuff I wouldn't have attended show after show.
Re: 70's AM gold
Quote:
I don't think you are pissing anyone off. I think you have a really valid point. Singing is one of the biggest missing ingredients in a lot of local music. Right down to the fact that there are maybe two sound engineers in the city that make it a point to get the vocals nice and loud in the mix. Ask anyone what they think of the sound and they will say they can't hear the vocals.
I wish that the singers involved realized that it is only one song and that they should focus and do an incredible job. The band rehearses for months prior to the show, learning all the songs. We then rely on the singers to show up and deliver something special.
Behind the scenes you might be surprised at just how hard it is to get the quality of singing we end up with. There have been singers turned down the night of the show simply because they didn't have it together at dress rehearsal.
Re: 70's AM gold
i appreciate oneoftheboys' point. the music was amazing and a couple tunes didn't quite have the vocals to match, but i think the point's overstated. in general, i think the singing was quite good. i like seeing the variety of folks up there.
to me it's not about note perfect vocal renditions.
see: laurence lavallee. not quite pitch perfect but his 'seasons in the sun' was great. damn funny and the crowd loved it.
i enjoyed seeing duncan and gabe up there, who i don't believe are vocalists by trade. they're no craig rawding, but both did fine jobs.
how about michael thibideau's house shaking 'sweet caroline'? the highlight of the night. dan jenkins' 'rhinestone cowboy' was killer. two master showmen right there.
http://www.myspace.com/preacherroe
12-5... the cantab, cambridge...charlie chesterman & the legendary motorbikes...silent service...eddie japan
1-23...sally o'brien's, somerville...golden west motor lodge...dearborn valley...the widowmakers
July 22-26...provincetown rocks festival
Re: 70's AM gold
"There have been singers turned down the night of the show simply because they didn't have it together at dress rehearsal."
Watching this happen is kind of funny, though.
Anyways:
I have gone to most of these nights, and always have a great time. I pay more attention to the band than to the singers, though. Even when I don't like the artist being showcased, I'm always very impressed with what goes on on that stage.
Case in point: Elvis Costello
Can't stand that guy. But GSMS shed a new light on his music, and I can now appreciate it more than I ever did.
And Duncan's right about Craig. That guy can sing his ass off and I never knew that!
......
Re: 70's AM gold
In response to preahahroe "...the point is overstated." I agree. I don't want to be too knit oicky about all this. None of us are perfect! I just wanted to see if this was just a big ego stroking festival. In some ways I think it still is but I'm glad to see a few people are not afraid to be honest. I have to say I very much enjoyed Rhinestine Cowboy, The hall and oats stuff and the sister of the guitar player thatsang carly simon. So enough on this already! What else shall we talk about?
How about what a freekin liar and war criminal our president is!
Re: 70's AM gold
Quote:
Of course everyone has their own reasons for being involved, but I'm of the opinion that the majority of what is called a scene around these parts is nothing but a big circle jerk. Until people that consider themselves fans, or better yet consumers, start stepping up and speaking their mind about the entertainment provided to them(or lack there of) this wont change.
Re: 70's AM gold
No matter what is said, positive or negative, people are either going to kiss your ass or tell you to fuck off.
I don't bother expressing my opinions about local bands to anyone but my friends anymore. If I say I love a band, I get called a ball-washer. If I say I don't like a band, I get called a bitch, or people tell me that's why they love me. I wish people could take ANY personal feelings and but them aside when someone expresses an opinion.
When I said I didn't like Hothead, the lead singer avoided me like the plague. That's ridiculous. It's not like I said I hate them all as people. I don't even know them!
Either way, you really can't win with most of the people in Worcester, so I don't bother anymore. I like what I like, I hate what I hate, and in the long run, my opinion really doesn't mean a fucking thing.
Re: 70's AM gold
Quote:
Wow! I had no idea that there were people out here with such strong feelings on this. It's good to hear tho' I'm new here and I just wanted to get a dialogue going on the whole "circle jerk" aspect of the scene in this town. I still don't want to hurt any one's feelings, but I think that the members of the "scene" need to be honest with themselves and "open" up the circle if you will.
Re: 70's AM gold
I think anyone accusing anyone of any sort of circle jerk needs to pony up some names. I for one play in a lot of bands, there are only a handful of bands in the area that I like. I prefer playing shows with these bands. As a result I become friendly with these people. Is that a circle jerk? By some definitions it may be. Considering how often I play shows and how many bands tend to be on bills these days I would not call these shows circle jerks.
Maybe you aren't referring to our band.
So folks, who is participating in this circle jerk? I am dying to know.
Re: 70's AM gold
I can see how some people would get the impression...but what some people consider a circle jerk, I consider support.
Not all critisism needs to be public, and there doesn't need to be rancor among people to have a great 'scene'.
Take a band like preacher roe for instance...they are pretty new to the scene, and have some growing to do as a band. Advice has been plentiful both public and private, and I think they are becoming a better band because of it. I know when we started off we had a lot of people trying to help us get better and it was appreciated.
The other aspect of the CJ is I am guessing seeing the same bands playing the scnene a lot. Of course you are going to get your curtain soc., hucks, thinners, etc...because they are good and people want to go see them...especially people in the circle jerk because we know of them...and when I go, I try to drag a few friends with me.
You are also going to get that impression because really, there are only 4 or 5 places to play in the city. Venues are less likely to take a chance with people they don't think will draw.
It is also my understanding that GSMS is a local music 'thing'...kind of hard to make that NOT a circle jerk...but I think its great support for the bands here as it exposes members of local bands to new people while playing songs they can relate to.
A better job could be done for the bands though, I would think setting up a place for CDs to be handed out would go a long way.
Re: 70's AM gold
Quote:
are you talking about at a GSMS show? There is no way there would be room for that.
Remember back when the Dog fist opened that area where the big TV is used to be a merchandise area. I wish that was still there.
The bands have over 300 opportunities to promote themselves at those shows. There is nothing stopping anyone from walking up to anyone or from tossing out some cds from the stage before, during or after thier performance. There is also nothing stopping other bands not involved in the GSMS from going to the show and flyering for shows, talking to people, leaving a card on the windshields and any other general networking. I know that when I know there is a big show with hundreds of music fans in Worcester I am thinking about how I can reach them to promote my own shit.
Re: 70's AM gold
I didn't say there weren't logistical problems to the idea :)
Re: 70's AM gold
The only thing I have to say about the circle jerk thing is that I hate being chastised for having friends. We play shows, as do most of the bands we are friends with, with many different people, from out of and in town. Why is it so bad that we all play together every once in a while.
I also agree with Buck and Duncan that the marketing for all shows, including ours, needs to be 1000x better. The GSMS is an ideal time for promotion, but I never use it. Whose fault is that? Me! And let me say the Duncan is only second to Buck when it comes to promotion of shows.
As for the criticism of the GSMS, I think it was very fair and I agree with portions of it. I think it's about time that someone not involved heavily in music in this area way in on what we have here. It always means so much more when the consumer is critical of the product.
Re: 70's AM gold
because I think your post will have a better context; oneoftheboys, are you in a band or did you just catch these shows?
Re: 70's AM gold
Regarding additional promo at GSMS shows. It would be great if there was some type of program/flyer/contact sheet that listed the participants bands/websites, etc. Frankly, we barely end up with enough time to get the show put together and the stage rigged, so it's hard to find the time to do little extras like that at the last minute (although I think I'll try to do that research for the next one ahead of time).
Regarding the whole circle jerk theory: I agree that critical distance is a necessary thing, but the bands I like, I like, and I will tell them when they are good (which is often, and probably why I like them in the first place). If they ask me for my opinion on a set or a new song, I will tell them honestly what I think of it, pointing out good and bad points.
There are local bands that I don't particularly care for. I suppose I express my opinion by not going to see them (not that I get out to a ton of shows anymore anyway - I wish I could spend every night playing or listening to music). Shit, I'm the biggest critic of the stuff we play in the Bee's Knees, and always want to change and improve the songs/stage act/etc. There are lots of people that come up to me at shows and tell me that they don't like our music, but can appreciate our efforts. That is totally cool with me, and doesn't piss me off at all. It's just an opinion, and I welcome it, whether I agree with it or not.
It's a boy Mrs. Walker, it's a boy...
Re: 70's AM gold
Worcester; because of its small town with lots of people dilemma, affords me and you the opportunity to not only see great music up close and personal but be friends with the people making the music.
It is one thing among many things that make Worcester a great place to live.
Re: 70's AM gold
I still think some of the best times I have had playing out are at Ralphs doing the acoustic thing...great atmosphere...good friends, and a great networking opportunity.
Re: 70's AM gold
And if the above 3 posts worth of positives constitutes a circle jerk, well then pass the jerkie on the left hand side. :-)
I'm out getting my abs airbrushed on...leave a message
Re: 70's AM gold
Quote:
By definition what you described Duncan would be more of a Daisy Chain, or maybe a Small Swingers Party where DP's are allowed; than a Circle Jerk. Just by admitting that there are only a handful of bands that you like in the area eliminates you from said Jerk. The problem I see, and refer to as a Circle Jerk, is just a pervasive niceness, a need for inclusion. I may be an asshole, but I don't think people who don't have their shit together should be given a chance when it comes to performing and believe a little honesty goes a long way in terms of helping a band mature.
I personally don't have a hard time sperating bands I like/dislike from PEOPLE I like/dislike. Arlene brought up Hothead earlier; a year ago I was asked to review a Christmas compilation, my first question when asked was "can I be honest?". The response to my honesty was shocking, and really changed my opinion of musicians in this city. I actually had all of Hothead show up at ralphs one night to confront me on my review. I had to explain to a group of adults, the difference between disliking them and disliking their submition to a fucking Christmas CD. That's weird. Brett Talbert is a genuinely nice guy, I personally don't have any use for his music, but unless he uses his band to define himself my opinion of his band should be taken no more personal than my opinion of his britches, which is to say not at all.
I learned a long time ago that the people who always have something nice to say are the people you don't want to put any capitol in. People by nature are very opinionated and unless Worcester is some sort of Matrix like anomaly, those onions matter. If you're not hearing or seeing those opinions then there is a lack of honesty. If there is no honesty there is no art.
The thing that I find funny is that it's musicians who are very talented who often are the people most unwilling to criticize their peers. Which is unfortunate in the sense that we have no tangible pecking order in Worcester. Without that hierarchy, there is nothing for younger, less polished musicians to shoot for; and the competition, the cut throat, back stabbing competition that makes the larger music business work the way it does never gets to teach it's lessons. Shelf life's, rehab and all.
Maybe I'm wrong, no that can't be; but until Worcester musicians talk about each other in public the way they do in private, the mildly entertaining year to year ebb and flow that we have grown to know and embrace in Worcester will stay just what it is; a very small ripple in a very big pond.
Paxton
OUT!
Re: 70's AM gold
"those onions matter"
I know what you meant to type, but I like this phrase much better. It deserves to be in a song.
Re: 70's AM gold
Quote:
Maybe I ment to mean the onions.
You'll understand next time I see you onstage and a wing a vidalia off your mellon.
Re: 70's AM gold
Quote:
I love vidalias. Sweet, and easy to see 'em coming. If you really want to inflict damage, use the little white boiling onions. You could put an eye out with one of those babies.
Re: 70's AM gold
how many bands are there in this city? And where do they play? and of the bands, how many are really worth seeing? I suppose that's a matter of taste? I was driving home from work the other morning and I got to thinking that this is really a small town once you'been here for a while. Not like other cities like springfield where all the clubs are clummped together. It doesn't seem that vibrant around here. Could that be the reason why everyone seems to know eachother and winds up on the same stage so much?
Re: 70's AM gold
so, let me get this straight: we're using the term "circle jerk" as a bad thing, right?
...
Re: 70's AM gold
for those of you who dont know Greg lives only one block from paris cinema.
Re: 70's AM gold
Quote:
We know. We see you watching us (and occasionally winking).
We like it.
Anyway, oneoftheboys has a very good point, and one that should not piss anybody off. As duncan said, we really work hard on the backing music, and we expect the singers to do the same, but sometimes it just doesn't happen for varying reasons - wrong style, wrong key, poor preparation, whatever. Stagemanship can carry the day, but it's a lot better when they're at least close. The idea is to show yourself/your band off - we make it a point to always mention a singer's band or project - so the better job you do, the better exposure it is for you, and the bigger the possible dividends.
It's also not about karaoke - the band has to play it pretty straight, but I always would rather hear a person make a song their own, than just hear an exact copy of the record. Grab it and shake it!
PS - "One Of The Boys" is the title of one of my favorite Mott The Hoople songs. Don't worry, I don't think they're scheduled for a GSMS show.
Re: 70's AM gold
That's an interseting point. It might be cool to see "interpretations" of hit songs
Re: 70's AM gold
Quote:
The deal is that sometimes alcohol is a factor.
Leave it better than when you found it...
Re: 70's AM gold
buck, you're just mad because the last time we were there i wouldn't let you sit right next to me. some people are so sensitive.
Re: 70's AM gold
I disagree with the whole cj thing. I was asked to play a major roll in one of the GSMS gigs as a stranger to most everyone in the band. So sometimes being a good musician and a hard worker still gets you the gig
Re: 70's AM gold
Quote:
That is exactly how it works. I knew you Robin, but the reason you were asked is because how many times could you see Joe Rockhead before noticing that you're an excellent guitar player, we all knew how you played. When we needed someone for that spot we talked about who in town could do the best job. You were it. Simple as that.
But trust me, to the people that believe this shit about Worcester being an incestuous CJ wont believe you. It is much easier to cry about things and blame everyone else than to just shut the hell up and play music, be friends with people, and hope everyone signs a 12 record deal with Sony.
Also let me add that as a direct result of these GSMS shows, more musical relationships and personal relationships have been created than existed before them.
Re: 70's AM gold
Doug here from San Diego, CA. I think it is perfectly fine to tell a band what you think of their music. But I do think since most musicians are the sensitive type you need to be constructive on the critique. Nothing worse than seeing a 21-38 yr old man cry. If the band isn't good enough for the stage they should be man(woman) enough to realize they need practice and work and will go home and do their homework. Of course the effects of alcohol and substances create such a veil of what they really sound like it is at times hard for them to realize what is really going on.
Bottom line, it's music have fun with it. If you are in it for the money you are probably in it for the wrong reason. Become a lawyer or some other fine paying job.
Excuse the disjointed entry. Woke up too early today and am now getting delirious.
Adios my fine friends,
dougo :straight:
"To live on the land, one must learn from the sea.'
Jacques Yve Cousteau.........