There are a lot of problems with The Pulse nominees. What Nytmare said is absolutely correct. I also noticed some nominees that are from Boston. Unfortunately, open voting means that anybody can have their mom send out a mass email to everyone they work with and now you have thousands of votes for you, whether you belong there or not. However, how could you make sure that every entry is valid? I know that's why Womag does it the way they do now (even though I will say there are problems there too, but not as much as with The Pulse). At least not every nominee is ridculous. Cliff Goodwin got nominated for Lifetime Achievement and Tim Hansen got nominated for Best Male Vocalist, etc. At least not EVERY nominee is a joke.
Which of the following is an r&b act? Jon Short Jason James & the Bay State House Rockers The Holmes Brothers Wilbur & the Dukes Whic of the following paid the most to produce thier c.d? Trebek One Lane Bridge Almada September Twilight which of the following spent the most on theri equipment? DJ Sprino DJ Syren Kid Optimus DJ Shame
which of the following actually DOESNT write songs? Wayne Winslow Joe Hogan Jediah Jarvis Sam James
which of the following is actually a bluegrass band Bees Knees Three Day Threshold Hot Day at the Zoo which of the following wins every competition they are in? Probable Cause Astrovan No Alibi White Chocolate Best roofie opportunity Venue Rehab Shbooms Irish Times The Compound which vocalist is actually from Worcester? Amanda Lirange Ticia Low Dawn Sweet Emily Grogan most hardcore band name 12 Step Program Hated Wreckoning Kultur
White chocolate is to Jam as <<blank>>is to Groove Singuya Hint of Lime Uncle Billy
Which of the singer/songwriters is not a singer? Which of the Best CD nominees didn't release a cd? Does Hardcore even exist anymore? Who are these vocalists again? (other than me of course, I know who I am)
I guess I can't complain if I don't know who a band is. If I haven't heard them, I cannot assume that they don't deserve it.
see there ya go, you have taken the conversation of pointless whining to actual discussion as to what makes them suck to the degree they do...nice job :)
who are you referring to as whining Keith? I have explained a million times over why these awards are stupid, so I hope you aren't calling me out, I just can't tell. I am not whining at all about these awards, but this website is here for people to talk about Worcester culture.
Last years posts still apply here. The bands have nothing to do with this. This is the Pulse Music Awards Readers Poll. They don't call it that but that is what it is and I think reader polls in publications in Worcester covering music, are dumb.
People who subscribe, read or buy Rolling Stoneand then participate in a music poll for instance, are engaged in the process of listening to music. The numbers of readers are so great that the ability to sway a vote in the direction of the Red Hot Chili Peppers because Flea's mom is stuffing the ballot is slim. In Worcester you are polling a population and readership that is not paying attention, so you only get votes from each bands respective fan base. It's not indicative of music in Worcester and therefore irrelevant.
Duncan, I am calling out everyone who rants about these things with the equivalent answer of...this sucks.
Until you get into the why it sucks, and the who whould and shouldn't be on these lists and why, it is a mindless rant that trys to ride the fence of 'I don't want to hurt any ones feelings, but the awards don't makes sense'
If the argument is, as was mine for WoMags, there is no obvious or credible criteria by which nominees where judged, and that is demonstrated by XY&Z bands being put on the list, that is an actual argument with my interpretation of the facts to back them up.
You can not have an argument on the Pulse awards with out getting into that stuff, anything less is a mindless rant.
Or I guess we could just grouse about like every other year and say, boy these suck.
Of course, every other sucky non-local award poll at least gets the dignity of arguing who should and should not be on the list...for some reason when people we know, or know some one who knows some one is on those lists, the list gets a...boy, they must have brain damage.
I guess that at this point, saying "they suck" is more of a concise reiteration of stuff we all said in the past. There are many pages of reason why they do suck on this site and others. Are you looking for a reminder why?
let me put words in your mouth Duncan and sum up your argument, which I thought you did rather succinctly here:
Imagine that if despite a shitty local band's ability to get a club packed, or to get votes, didn’t win them an award in their respective category?
So, WoMag DID that this year...
your reply...still sucks.
The Pulse comes out with their awards...rather than delve into the process and then back it up with bands that make your point, which of course would then allow for real debate on if those bands DO make your point, you come out with...
It sucks.
and you wonder why we have the same discussion year after year?
Thank you to those that pointed out the flaws and even the stuff the mags got right. If getting into the bands that belong on the lists, or are miscategorized, or hell, aren't even FROM or PLAY in the worcester area, never mind if they have even DONE anything in the past year (if in fact that is the time frame we are talking about, which for some reason neither mag ever states) is taboo, or off limits because it will create ill will among friends, or bands, or even web site readers then...
Well, Since I'm him, it would be reasonable to assume that Luke MacNeil is not the winner in the "Band that doesn't exist" category... I might just be a songwriter you've never heard before.
But I'm flattered, really.
The criteria to be nominated for the awards is... someone has to nominate you. Thankfully, ... enough people have to vote for you for the nomination before you can be considered a candidate, in this case, the top 4 nominated parties in each category move on to be finalists. The same person cannot vote twice, so you can't just sit at the computer and crank out votes.
.... And I don't think it's the physical award that people are competing for, it's the press. "Winner of the 2007 Worcester Music Awards" might not mean anything to you.. but to some booking agent in Minnesota, the guy (or girl) with that is going to get the gig before the guy with no press.
I love songwriting, and even moreso interpreting and sharing other old folk tunes, but this is also a business... and those of us that are serious about it, treat it as such. We're competing for the press which may or may not attract new fans, or make us more marketable in the future. Not for a metal plated microphone stuck in a piece of wood.
I think what the majority of the people that think that The Pulse awards are crap, are saying so because they want them to mean something to people HERE first then in Minnesota. That's what I am saying at least.
Saying things like "...guy (or girl) with that is going to get the gig before the guy with no press." sounds good, but I don't think that is true. In my experience thus far, your draw and if you are very lucky, the quality of your music will get you the gig, long before a Pulse Music Award will.
Best of luck in the awards. I hope you can parlay it into something great.
As a result of you posting which is a result of you being nominated I did check out your music as I am sure others will as well. So in that respect, The Pulse is exposing some music.
"Saying things like "...guy (or girl) with that is going to get the gig before the guy with no press." sounds good, but I don't think that is true. In my experience thus far, your draw and if you are very lucky, the quality of your music will get you the gig, long before a Pulse Music Award will... "
You are certainly correct. Your draw is the biggest asset that local venues are looking for.. When we're talking about out of state touring though... The press kit plays a very important role. And an award or two doesn't hurt it. It certainly doesn't make or break an artist.. just something to add to the list of accomplishments for a rising performer.
But I can see where you're coming from about locality.
I know the folks at Pulse, they're very nice, and no matter how much bashing you guys do, they really are making an attempt to do something for local artists. The reviewed my CD last year (Which does exist by the way) and were very kind. I even interviewed a band for them a while back, I went to their house, met with the members of the band, and tried to work with the band to the best of my ability to get their message out.... So don't just blindly knock these folks. They want ideas, and they want to be a publication that you want to read... If you have an idea to make it better, talk to them, write a letter to the editor, start writing your own reviews and sending them in.. forward your press releases... if you want it to be your paper, make it your paper.
I play at the Java Hut quite frequently, and I make it my goal each time I play there to try and get just one person to stop smoking or playing magic the gathering long enough to listen to one song. If I've done that, I consider it a good gig. The goal is not to sell cds, not to get mailing list entries... simply to get one person to pay attention for one song.
There's always those few lines in a song that catch people... and you can see from the stage when something hits someone.. when they stop for a second to think, or get choked up... those are the good gigs.
Some other venues have built in listening rooms. Every seat is silent and they are absorbing the material for a sheer love of music... That's a different deal entirely. Now, I've already got the attention of the room by default, my goal is to invoke some sort of emotion... and then sell records. Mostly I find at these types of gigs I learn more about the tunes that I'm playing from the audience.
I'm not knocking either type of venue, they're just very different. All of the worcester clubs I have played are the former... the goal is only to engage one audience member.
I'm glad you dug the tunes, and hopefully I'll see you around sometime. I'm also glad I stumbled upon this site, I'd have been active long ago had I known it was here.
lukemacneil wrote: I'm glad you dug the tunes, and hopefully I'll see you around sometime.
to be clear, I didn't actually say I dug the tunes, I just checked them out. :lol: I hope to see you play live sometime also, be sure to post about your shows up here.
Quote:
lukemacneil wrote: I'm also glad I stumbled upon this site, I'd have been active long ago had I known it was here.
Happy to have you here, we need more voices contributing to this place.
Examples people, not just mindless rants...back them up!
I have to agree with Terrible Buddist here....I had no idea what specifically this thread was discussing until Katatonic posted the list
Last years posts still apply here. The bands have nothing to do with this. This is the Pulse Music Awards Readers Poll. They don't call it that but that is what it is and I think reader polls in publications in Worcester covering music, are dumb. People who subscribe, read or buy Rolling Stoneand then participate in a music poll for instance, are engaged in the process of listening to music.
If there was a Worcester or Central Mass or even a New England Music Magazine would a readers poll/awards still be dumb?
In Worcester you are polling a population and readership that is not paying attention, so you only get votes from each bands respective fan base. It's not indicative of music in Worcester and therefore irrelevant.
How do you gage what people are paying attention to? I know thats one of the problems with Worcester but what do you suggest? Should there be no attempt at music awards until all the music venues in town sell out on a regular basis? Who gets to decide when why and how musicians in the area get to be recognized? At least Pulse and WoMag make an effort and by doing so maybe they get someone to pay attention in the process.
"Anything that you could ever want or be you already have and are"
Award for best complainer about awards Award for guy with most awards who still complains about awards Award for biggest loser Award for demonstrating why awards suck Award for suckiest band Award for redundancy Award Award for most bulletin board posts about awards Award for being better than everyone who won awards Award for pointing out an illegitimate nominee
I think Tim's awards have even less credibility than WoMag and Pulse, let's start a new thread about that.
Tim you like winning these things huh, don't want to say what you really think?
at the risk of being redundant to Tim but to also answer Cindy who isn't as aware of the complaints surrounding these awards, here is a thread from '05.This is before WoMag changed their system for selecting nominees. It has a lot of the stuff that is just getting brought up year after year. link
I write for the Pulse and I have no "documented" brain damage. But I do wait till the last minute to get my stories in...I work well under pressure. What can I say, I enjoy writing, and it's a lot more fun than covering town meetings for the Telegram.
its a aimed at people that are not like me. Its aimed at college kids, (which i am not) and lacks relevence in any article, contest, award etc., .I think its just a way for somneone to get money from local Worc business' for ads. I like publications to have a purpose, a point, meaning.
"Take out an advertisement for your next show in the Pulse Keith, tell me if you get more people to your show. Win an award, tell me if you get one CD sale or email from it. Yet these are the awards that we are suppose to be so flattered to receive?"
Word.
Advance high 5's and good games to all the winners.
I think we know the main problem with both awards is that no one knows the what the criteria is to be nominated for a Turtle Boy, and that the ONLY criteria for the Pulse is that you can get a lot of people to vote for you, whether they know anything about you or your band at all.
And Duncan, even though we all know that these awards will not get a band any extra CD sales or any more people at shows, it is still nice to be recognized. I think it's why I get upset when I don't get nominated in Womag when 7 other chicks, most of whom I've never heard of, and one is a back up singer, get nominated. Yet, my band gets nominated for best metal (which we aren't) and the [other] band gets nominated a bunch of times too. I guess I don't get why my bands are qualified, but I am not. Like you said Duncan, those ommitted are "bad". So I am a "bad" singer, but my bands are "good". Confusing.
Katatonic wrote: I think we know the main problem with both awards is that no one knows the what the criteria is to be nominated for a Turtle Boy, and that the ONLY criteria for the Pulse is that you can get a lot of people to vote for you, whether they know anything about you or your band at all.
And Duncan, even though we all know that these awards will not get a band any extra CD sales or any more people at shows, it is still nice to be recognized. I think it's why I get upset when I don't get nominated in Womag when 7 other chicks, most of whom I've never heard of, and one is a back up singer, get nominated. Yet, my band gets nominated for best metal (which we aren't) and the [other] band gets nominated a bunch of times too. I guess I don't get why my bands are qualified, but I am not. Like you said Duncan, those ommitted are "bad". So I am a "bad" singer, but my bands are "good". Confusing.
Amanda I think that saying that "no one knows the what the criteria is to be nominated for a Turtle Boy" is kind of silly. Seriously, it doesn't take much to figure out what the criteria might be. It's a music award, not the Nobel Prize. They have a panel of who they think are knowledgeable and engaged in the scene nominate who they think are the best. That's all. WoMag's awareness can come into question, their selections may be off, but I don't see a great conspiricy to cover up a criteria so that the real talent in Worcester can't win.
I went to look for the nominations to see what women you are referring to but I couldn't find them. I can't speak for WoMag but I think you are right in interpreting that by omitting a person or band from the nominations that they are making a statement. I think that is a good thing, not because I want people to be pissed off but because a reaction means that someone is paying attention.
It surprises me that you care so much about it, but it's good for WoMag that you do. It means that they are not entirely irrelevant.
at the risk of being redundant to Tim but to also answer Cindy who isn't as aware of the complaints surrounding these awards, here is a thread from '05.This is before WoMag changed their system for selecting nominees. It has a lot of the stuff that is just getting brought up year after year. link
ok i looked back at that thread. Its too bad that these things are so ineffective. Apparently people in Worcester havent been paying attention for a long time. You can complain and dissect and re evaluate the awards over and over but until they actually are effective why even bother? You can't blame the magazine's if the public doesnt care enough to google your band after they saw it in print.
Duncan(and anyone else) Let me ask a simple yes or know question. Should who ever Womag (or Pulse for that matter) has nominating CD's for local CD of the year, listen to every locally released CD before they vote on local CD of the year?
"I don't see a great conspiricy to cover up a criteria so that the real talent in Worcester can't win."
I never said that, and I never implied that either. Obviously it's who they think are good. I'm guessing that's all that goes into it. I'm dropping that...
As for the other girls nominated....Dawn and Sunta Africa were the two I knew, and Cathy Cah is the backup singer. I didn't know the other people I think. I don't remember their names. Oh wait, maybe Lisa Marie....anyway. Whatever, I guess I shouldn't care, but it's hard not to take the omission personally. I know I shouldn't, but I do.
Katatonic wrote: Whatever, I guess I shouldn't care, but it's hard not to take the omission personally. I know I shouldn't, but I do.
You should take it personally, those bastards at WoMag are saying you aren't the best in Worcester by your omission in their best of poll. It's up to you and the public to decide if a WoMag music poll means anything.
Katatonic wrote: "I don't see a great conspiricy to cover up a criteria so that the real talent in Worcester can't win."
I never said that, and I never implied that either. Obviously it's who they think are good. I'm guessing that's all that goes into it. I'm dropping that...
As for the other girls nominated....Dawn and Sunta Africa were the two I knew, and Cathy Cah is the backup singer. I didn't know the other people I think. I don't remember their names. Oh wait, maybe Lisa Marie....anyway. Whatever, I guess I shouldn't care, but it's hard not to take the omission personally. I know I shouldn't, but I do.
Admittedly, I haven't seen any of Cathy Cah's recent musical endeavors, but she certainly has a history as a ripping lead singer. The first time I heard her sing a tune, I think I said "holy shit!"
Just because you or I might not be familiar with a name on a ballot doesn't automatically mean that they're not worthy. It may make you feel like you don't really know what's happening in this city. It's a different story when you ARE familiar with names on the list and either A) are of the opinion that they aren't very good, and/or B) are not as good, in your opinion, as other names that were not on the list.
So if you care enough to think about this for more than a minute, you're wondering if either the names that are on the lists are there out of politics, laziness, or because these artists are campaigning for the attention.
Just goes to show us how both small and large this scene really is....read on...
Quote:
barry wrote: Duncan(and anyone else) Let me ask a simple yes or know question. Should who ever Womag (or Pulse for that matter) has nominating CD's for local CD of the year, listen to every locally released CD before they vote on local CD of the year?<br />
In a perfect world, the answer is a resounding YES. Awards or no, there is nothing more basic or obvious than the idea that the local entertainment reporters should by all means listen to every local CD that is released. If that's what you're basing any of your biases about their respective awards on, then you should look at the issue that A) local musical acts need to get their music out to local press (seems like common sense to me) and B) local music press should be aware of what's going on in all facets of the music scene.
On one hand, this should be the most obvious and easy thing to accomplish. Worcester isn't that big of a city, and if there are a total of 5 or 6 journalists from mainstream press in charge of knowing what's going on, it should be as easy as can be. Right?
Obviously not.
On the other hand, Worcester's mainstream press, specifically the arts/music coverage, is notoriously overlooked, undervalued, underfunded, understaffed, and as a result deemed ineffectual and lame. For veteran reporters it's hard not to get lazy with regard to coverage of the local scene... Let's look in my inbox and see who has sent me their new CD and press kit... Oh, here's another email from so-and-so, and look at all the shows they're playing. I still haven't gone to see them, but they've got to be good, right?
These awards might be the local press' idea of giving notice to the local music scene that they can't devote more of their time and their advertisers' money on the rest of the year.
To people in the know, specifically the folks hanging out at a message board like this, the whole concept of these awards is transparent and it either bothers you because you feel insulted and disappointed by being excluded, included amongst others you don't feel belong, or because you just don't feel there's any credibility to any of it.
Then there is a slim chance that someone who has less of a clue than what many accuse the local press itself of having, might read through the polls and just file away a name because it's familiar and deemed good enough to be on a poll.
That is where folks like Duncan have a point that it's frustrating that these polls/awards may not reflect what one might consider truly great in this city, in favor for mediocre squeaky wheels who work their email lists like crazy.
But adding to that very point, is my feeling that the list of "regular folks" who read these polls and glean anything from them that lasts is probably more minuscule than the editors fear.
So in the grand scheme of things, we're left pondering whether or not they should even bother with polls or awards at all. Some might say they shouldn't. It's pointless. Give up. You're dead.
It appears that Womag took some of that kind of criticism to heart in the last few years, asking for outside help, admitting that their internal reporters might not know everything that is going on in this city, and getting a list of worthy names to put on the ballot from people who they felt had a better connection to what was really going on. That's a step in the right direction because it shows that they're trying to offer a better awards poll than they have. The fact that they approached outside help at all shows that they're at least interested in doing a better job with these awards polls. Granted, one or two years of intention is not going to undo a decade of bad reputation, but in my opinion, at least they're giving themselves an opportunity to be credible someday.
Speaking personally, I can't say that I'm either bothered with or satisfied with either the Turtle Boys or the Pulse awards. I certainly have opinions about both of their choices and methods, but the bottom line for me is that I'd rather think about something else than to get worked up. (My novella here might say otherwise, but...)
So while I'm adding to the pollution, I'll just say that these awards, this debate, and my perspective on the local scene tells me something about myself, and myself only. It tells me that there is music being made well below the radar that is incredible and I need to stay open to finding out about it, be it from polls, friends, websites and hell, seeing them play. It tells me that I'm guilty of being lazy and jaded about the local scene, and before I start bitching about others not going out to see shows, I need to bitch at myself. It tells me that the cutting edge has moved on, and if I want to stay anywhere near it, I need to look elsewhere for information. With the immediacy of the internet replacing reading weekly papers or listening to the radio to find out about music that moves me, there's just no competition. I can't even begin to scratch the surface of great music that's out there. Every day I find something new or old. Maybe they're from Greenland, and not Green Street, but the fact is that they could just as easily be from Green Street for all I know. If it wasn't for Duncan telling me about Walter the Orange Ocean, a Worcester band that deserves your attention, I'm not sure I would have ever found out about them. Thank you word of mouth. Thank you Musicblogs (how late am I at finding this endless supply of great musical information?). Thank you internet radio. Thank you mix CDs. Thank you Myspace. Thank you India. Thank you Alanis.
I'm going to go about my business now. I'll try to spend at least part of my day helping to make the music scene that I love and love to be a part of, better. Just as Duncan does by doing many things, not the least of which was creating this website for us to exchange our thoughts on. Just as Amanda does by caring about the music scene and doing her part to create the best music she knows how to so some of us might enjoy it. Just as Pez does by playing in many great bands, not to mention being in Huxley, who made some of greatest music I've ever heard. Just as Keith does by always having something to say about the music scene to incite debate and discussion like that that might actually affect something somewhere. Just like Linnea does by not being in a band, yet going to clubs and paying attention to threads like this, showing that she has an opinion even if she isn't in a band. Just like Barry, who might be a pain in the ass, who if no one else ever knows, did more to help recharge Worcester's musical batteries throughout the 90's than almost anyone I can think of.
If you read this far, you need more work to do.
If I wrote this much, I guess I do too.
Roger
P.S.
If you think that someone was sorely missing from these polls, now is a great opportunity to spread the word about them.
Terrible buddhist made a commetn about Simon-Cowell type-criticism for these awards. That reminded me of American Idol and an article I read last week about the fact that last years winner sold fewer c.d's than any of his predecessors while a runner up sold over 1 million and blew him out of the water. This is another example of how the whole 'reader poll' concept can go wrong. The most popular isnt always the most talented (cough)dubya!(cough)
Katatonic and PEZ: Emily Grogan is extrmemly talented, but NOT from Worcester, she's from Boston, so I don't think she belings in this either.
PEZ HDATZ is an acoustic blue grass band....does that make them a 'Hippy band'? I dont know?? What exactly IS a hippy band anyway??
Uncle Billy's isnt a 'jam band' They pride themselves on writing new songs in a classic rock stlye.....does that make them a hippy band? (hippy band should be a category....)
For a quick education on local jazz listen to WICN 2 hours a day for 2 months and you should get up to speed
Solo act vs. singer song writer: I'm assuming solo act can be a cover act while singer song writer would be someone who performs their own material.
If Hot Day At The Zoo are a bluegrass act, then I was wrong in my assumptions about them, which were based on the bills I've seen their name appear on, and the people I know who follow them.
I'd certainly call Uncle Billy's Smokehouse a "jam" band, as they are prone to playing extended improv jams in the middle of their songs. And if their goal is to get their name out to a demographic who would enjoy watching a band play extended improv jams in the middle of their songs, then I would say that is the proper category for them to be nominated.
RE: the "Solo Act" vs. "Singer-Songwriter" issue. They need to trim these categories down, for real. See below.
This poll has the same probem as the WoMag awards, in that there's just too goddamn many categories. Narrow the scope down a bit, and nominate the real cream of the crop. None of this "let's-have-a-million-categories-so-we-have-room-for-everybody-and-his-fucking-brother" nonsense.
Best Rock/Pop Act
Best Indie/Alternative Act
Best Improv/Jam Act
Best Hip-Hop Act
Best Metal/Hardcore Act
Best Electronic/Experimental Act
Best Jazz Act
Best New Band
Best Cover Band
Best Singer-Songwriter/Solo Act
Best Male Vocalist (and mention what the hell BAND they're in)
Best Female Vocalist (same thing here)
Best Club DJ
Best Dance Club
Best Live Music Club
Best Live Act
You see, my band probably wouldn't get nominated for any of these categories, strictly because the competition would be too stiff. And I'd be fine with that.
Quote: Wirrlygirl wrote: You can't blame the magazine's if the public doesn't care enough to google your band after they saw it in print. whoa whoa whoa! of course you can.
You can't blame the magazine's if the public doesnt care enough to google your band after they saw it in print. Paxton wrote: I can't blame local media for lack of cultural relevancy? What a bunch of pedestrians we've become. Rock on!
It seems to me that every prolonged thread about the local music scene always mentions the lack of attendance at shows and that the general public just doesnt care. Do each of you think that overhauling WoMag and Pulse are the answer to that problem? Does Worcester's Cultural Relevancy rest solely on thier shoulders? Of course not. This website wouldn't exist if it WoMag and Pulse were the only answer.
Other than overhauling MoMag and Pulse what other ideas does everyone have about sharing Worcester's Cultural Relevancy with the Worcester Masses that we think "just don't care"?
Pez, this is Amanda from Standard Deviation, so ya, it's that Amanda.
Roger, I know that Cathy can sing extremely well. I heard her do something at a Green Street and was blown away. I am unsure how often her band played last year, but I am pretty sure she doesn't sing for that band. That's all I'm saying. Shouldn't someone nominated actually sing for a band? Otherwise, I have a bunch of students here at school that sing better than any front-person in any band, know what I mean? I also mentioned earlier that just because I haven't heard of someone doesn't mean they shouldn't be nominated. I am definitely not the most up to date person for all music in Worcester. But I will say that I take the time to look up a these people to find out who they are, and rarely get any good info from Google or anything. Why can't every damn band just get a MySpace....
(I just friend requested you) and found standard deviation on myspace as well as more than half of those nominee's. I also noticed (to my embarassment) that im already friends with some of them but had never bothered listening to them
Wirrly
hmmm, brianwashing high school kids....assainating every sinlge muscian not from Worcester.... get stickers that say: GO SEE WORCESTER LOCAL MUSIC and stick em on our asses......
i kid i kid.....
if any of us knew how to get people into clubs, we'd be fucking rich! and most likely go somewhere else.
It seems to me that every prolonged thread about the local music scene always mentions the lack of attendance at shows and that the general public just doesnt care. Do each of you think that overhauling WoMag and Pulse are the answer to that problem? Does Worcester's Cultural Relevancy rest solely on thier shoulders? Of course not. This website wouldn't exist if it WoMag and Pulse were the only answer. Other than overhauling MoMag and Pulse what other ideas does everyone have about sharing Worcester's Cultural Relevancy with the Worcester Masses that we think "just don't care"?
I find that very weird to read.It's a primary function of media to showcase and direct culture, not just report on pumpkin carving contests.That’s the whole point.
Maybe because your question makes no sense. Instead of looking for creative solutions to otherwise non-existent problems wouldn’t it be easier to just admit that your media outlets don’t function the way they are supposed too?
Ok, I’ll answer anyways.I’ll print 200,000 flyers for Tim Hansons next show, you hand deliver them to everyone in Worcester.Let us know how that works out.
We can't really talk about what SHOULD be done, when we don't know what WAS done?
Ok, thats not true. I said it before, and I will restate myself, (damn I need some more coffee, or Liam to sleep through the damned night) a band that has not played more than the number of fingers I have on my left hand in a year, nor released a cd in that time span, should not be eligable for an award, if those awards are panel based.
I think there is room for 2 types of awards in this city...one is obviously popularity based, you rally your fans, friends, grandmothers, and who ever else has a 'pulse' and get them to vote for you. Its very American Idolish and doesn't mean you are getting the best bands as listened to by a 'critical audience'. Perhaps there should be some sort of simon cowell panel to weed out a band that has really not been in the scene or REALLY sucks or what have you, but realistically, its up to the people.
The other type of award, which I personally would put more credence to, but that doesn't make it 'better', would be the critical choice, like what WoMag tried to do. To do this correctly however takes real criteria and people that are out there actually seeing the bands and listening to the cds. I think they got part of that right this year. The short of it is, YES, they should be going to shows, YES, they should be listening to cds, YES it should be something that bands should submit their work to.
and now for the BUT. Who is going to do it? I commend Gabe for taking the initiative to do his weekend reviews. That is the kind of stuff that makes me say, boy I want to check out that band next time I have a chance, or boy, you know what there is a lot of good music in our scene right now, its good to see it getting noticed. This is also the kind of thing that SHOULD be in Womag and provide a starting point at the end of a year for these awards.
I also commend the one songs reviews. Again, that kind of critical analysis of songs gets debate going, it makes people want to listen so that they can offer their views, and its also good for the bands so THEY can get an idea of what others perception is and decide to take it to heart or say...fuck them, they don't 'get' me :)
Duncan has been trying to nail the idea of the process into my thick skull for a while, and I agree with him, the process seems to be broken. The part where I disagree is, with out delving into what they got right and what they got wrong, you can't really decide how or why. If I say, man, I don't get how Lusting Kay was left off the best local band ever list, the answer then becomes, well, your guitar player can't play a lick, you have only been around for a few years, have one demo cd to your credit which you released a year and a half ago, and played all of 7 shows last year. So there you have reasons the band does not belong on a list...from there, BUT Huck should be on that list, they have released like 4 cds in the past 4 years, they play to a packed house every weekend, and paul is just so cute. Now you have criteria by which you are judging and can even debate with people how to vote. Novel idea, no? Of course, its all conjecture if we don't know what the shaddowy figures had for criteria when nominating people and bands for awards.
Best Blues/R&B: The only one I’ve seen is Jason James. Seen him a bunch of times, and I’ve never really felt one way about him, or the other. Maybe he’s the best Worcester has to offer, but I don’t know. I wouldn’t be terribly surprised if he was in the top 4, though.
Best CD: I haven’t heard any of them. The only one of these bands I’ve even seen is Trebek. But I just heard Walter the Orange Ocean’s disc, and I find it really hard to believe that it’s not at least in the top four. But Almada are in the WBCN Rumble this year, so they must be doing something right. Are they actually a Worcester band, though?
Best Singer-Songwriter Act: I’ve only heard Jediah. He’s good. Never even heard of the other dudes.
Best Club DJ: I’m only familiar w/ Shame, but he’s impressive enough to get my vote any day of the week. My ex-girlfriend swore by Kid Optimus, but I’ve never heard him.
Best Country/Americana Act: I only know the Bees Knees. They’re pretty good at what they do, I guess. I certainly couldn’t fault anyone else for liking them. Three Day Threshold aren't from here. Maybe I'm wrong, but I always thought Hot Day At The Zoo were supposed to be a hippy band.
Best Cover Band: People probably want to bitch about this category even being here, but I understand the need for it, because it’s what a lot of people want to see, when they go out. The only one I’ve seen is White Chocolate. They’re a lot of fun, but with the exception of Ed Barnett, I don’t think I’d consider them the “best” at anything.
Best Dance Venue: Wait a minute… isn’t Rehab in Irish Times? Seriously, what the fuck?
Best Female Vocalist: I just assumed Amanda Lirange was Amanda from Standard Deviation. Is that not the case? Emily Grogan’s not from here, so far as I know.
Best Hardcore Act: I saw Wreckoning, and thought they were pretty good, but Sullivan still needs to find a band that he won’t totally overshadow. Gabe & I found a Hated CD lying in the street one time. We listened to it. We laughed at them.
Best Jam & Groove Act: I’ve actually seen 3 of these bands. White Chocolate belongs in the cover band category. Uncle Billy’s are really good at what they do. Hint of Lime are fucking boring as shit.
Best Jazz Act: I’m totally lost, here. I was always down with the Sonic Explorers. Don’t know anything else about local jazz, which I kinda feel bad about. Best Live Act: This category should be strictly reserved for bands you go see, because you know goddamned well you’re going to have a good fucking time. There is no way in hell OSB are one of the best live bands in town. Seriously. I don’t even think they’re a bad band, necessarily, but there is absolutely nothing special about them, as a live act. And we played with Trebek one time, and I didn’t feel one way or the other about them. There is still nothing in this town that will compare to a live Balls or Deadites show, both of which are conspicuously absent from this list.
Best Live Venue: No real problems here. I don’t go to shows at Irish Times, but I’m sure there are people who enjoy it.
Best Male Vocalist: Tim Hansen is my personal favorite in town, but the fact that Jediah isn’t nominated is completely fucking retarded. Who are these other guys? Maybe I’ve seen their bands, but don’t know their names.
Best Metal Act: I think Craig is a really great singer & front-man. Skulltoboggan doesn’t do much for me, but they probably at least deserve a nomination. Wreckoning is in the hardcore category... Keep them there. I can’t speak for the others.
Best Up and Comers Act: I’ve seen absolutely none of these bands. Maybe some of them are pretty good. Even so, I’d have a really hard time believing any of them are better than Hey Now Morris Fader. It’s criminal to not see them get any kind of acknowledgement. And what about Walter the Orange Ocean? Are they new, within the last year?
Best Pop Act: I can’t say I have a problem with this category at all. Jediah & OSB are pretty vanilla for my tastes, but these are all good pop bands.
Best Punk Act: The Numbskulls are some of my favorite people on Earth. They’ve got some really good songs, and I enjoy seeing them. I don’t really think they’re one of the “best” punk bands I’ve ever seen, but they at least deserve a nomination. The Balls are pure awesomeness. I know nothing of these other jokers.
Best Radio DJ: Is Capt. PJ the only actual local DJ listed here? Who’s Mike Hsu? Maybe he’s from here. Regardless, this category is bullshit. (And I really like Carmelita.)
Best Rap/Hip-Hop Act: I don’t even know where to go for good hip-hop in this town. But Nytmare is fucking awesome, and even though I’ve never seen any of the dudes on this list, I’m sure he’s better than at least one of them.
Best Rock Act: Call me an asshole, but I’m pretty sure Gutta is better than at least one of these bands. And Thinner are too, and so are the Black. If I’m wrong on all counts, then the current state of the scene is way better than I give it credit for.
Best Solo Act: I don’t know any of these guys except for Jediah. I also don’t know what the difference is between a "solo" act, and a "singer-songwriter" act, for the purpose of this list.
flyers.... been there done that. it gets about a 2% responce if your lucky. As far as the local media outlets go...I have gotten plenty of responce to coverage I've had in the Telegram and Gazette. I still think there's an answer to my non existant problem. I'm leaving for Lala land to look for it. Be back in 20.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
They are beyond ridiculous ... all you need is one of the following:
1.) ALOT of spare time
2.) many internet savy friends
3.) access to a small asian country
and you can be on the ballot / win.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
why?
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
(I'll ALWAYS beat this dead horse!)
Pulse Magazine is irritating, every aspect of it irritating!
Talk about meaningless commercialism.....I think you have to show documented brain damage to work for them.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
Examples people, not just mindless rants...back them up!
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
I was very surprised to see some of the ommisions in this years nominations. I don't recognize alot of the bands/ nominee's this year.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
The hip hop nominees are way off.. The Pulse Mag is the worst..

I voted for him! (nh)
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
There are a lot of problems with The Pulse nominees. What Nytmare said is absolutely correct. I also noticed some nominees that are from Boston. Unfortunately, open voting means that anybody can have their mom send out a mass email to everyone they work with and now you have thousands of votes for you, whether you belong there or not. However, how could you make sure that every entry is valid? I know that's why Womag does it the way they do now (even though I will say there are problems there too, but not as much as with The Pulse). At least not every nominee is ridculous. Cliff Goodwin got nominated for Lifetime Achievement and Tim Hansen got nominated for Best Male Vocalist, etc. At least not EVERY nominee is a joke.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
Here are the nominees:
Best Blues/R&B Act
Jon Short
Jason James & the Bay State House Rockers
The Holmes Brothers
Wilbur & the Dukes
Best CD
Trebek
One Lane Bridge
Almada
September Twilight
Best Club DJ
DJ Sprino
DJ Syren
Kid Optimus
DJ Shame
Best Singer-Songwriter Act
Wayne Winslow
Joe Hogan
Jediah Jarvis
Sam James
Best Country/Americana Act
Bees Knees
Three Day Threshold
Hot Day at the Zoo
Best Cover Band
Probable Cause
Astrovan
No Alibi
White Chocolate
Best Dance Venue
Rehab
Shbooms
Irish Times
The Compound
Best Female Vocalist
Amanda Lirange
Ticia Low
Dawn Sweet
Emily Grogan
Best Hardcore Act
12 Step Program
Hated
Wreckoning
Kultur
Best Jam & Groove Act
Singuya
Hint of Lime
Uncle Billy
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
example #1: the ink makes my eyes water....
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
Which of the following is an r&b act?
Jon Short
Jason James & the Bay State House Rockers
The Holmes Brothers
Wilbur & the Dukes
Whic of the following paid the most to produce thier c.d? Trebek
One Lane Bridge
Almada
September Twilight
which of the following spent the most on theri equipment? DJ Sprino
DJ Syren
Kid Optimus
DJ Shame
which of the following actually DOESNT write songs?
Wayne Winslow
Joe Hogan
Jediah Jarvis
Sam James
which of the following is actually a bluegrass band
Bees Knees
Three Day Threshold
Hot Day at the Zoo
which of the following wins every competition they are in? Probable Cause
Astrovan
No Alibi
White Chocolate
Best roofie opportunity Venue
Rehab
Shbooms
Irish Times
The Compound
which vocalist is actually from Worcester?
Amanda Lirange
Ticia Low
Dawn Sweet
Emily Grogan
most hardcore band name
12 Step Program
Hated Wreckoning
Kultur
White chocolate is to Jam as <<blank>>is to Groove
Singuya
Hint of Lime
Uncle Billy
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
Which of the singer/songwriters is not a singer?
Which of the Best CD nominees didn't release a cd?
Does Hardcore even exist anymore?
Who are these vocalists again? (other than me of course, I know who I am)
I guess I can't complain if I don't know who a band is. If I haven't heard them, I cannot assume that they don't deserve it.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
see there ya go, you have taken the conversation of pointless whining to actual discussion as to what makes them suck to the degree they do...nice job :)
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
who are you referring to as whining Keith? I have explained a million times over why these awards are stupid, so I hope you aren't calling me out, I just can't tell. I am not whining at all about these awards, but this website is here for people to talk about Worcester culture.
Last years posts still apply here. The bands have nothing to do with this. This is the Pulse Music Awards Readers Poll. They don't call it that but that is what it is and I think reader polls in publications in Worcester covering music, are dumb.
People who subscribe, read or buy Rolling Stoneand then participate in a music poll for instance, are engaged in the process of listening to music. The numbers of readers are so great that the ability to sway a vote in the direction of the Red Hot Chili Peppers because Flea's mom is stuffing the ballot is slim. In Worcester you are polling a population and readership that is not paying attention, so you only get votes from each bands respective fan base. It's not indicative of music in Worcester and therefore irrelevant.
at least it is to me.
www.duncanarsenault.com
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
Duncan, I am calling out everyone who rants about these things with the equivalent answer of...this sucks.
Until you get into the why it sucks, and the who whould and shouldn't be on these lists and why, it is a mindless rant that trys to ride the fence of 'I don't want to hurt any ones feelings, but the awards don't makes sense'
If the argument is, as was mine for WoMags, there is no obvious or credible criteria by which nominees where judged, and that is demonstrated by XY&Z bands being put on the list, that is an actual argument with my interpretation of the facts to back them up.
You can not have an argument on the Pulse awards with out getting into that stuff, anything less is a mindless rant.
Or I guess we could just grouse about like every other year and say, boy these suck.
Of course, every other sucky non-local award poll at least gets the dignity of arguing who should and should not be on the list...for some reason when people we know, or know some one who knows some one is on those lists, the list gets a...boy, they must have brain damage.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
I guess that at this point, saying "they suck" is more of a concise reiteration of stuff we all said in the past. There are many pages of reason why they do suck on this site and others. Are you looking for a reminder why?
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
let me put words in your mouth Duncan and sum up your argument, which I thought you did rather succinctly here:
Imagine that if despite a shitty local band's ability to get a club packed, or to get votes, didn’t win them an award in their respective category?
So, WoMag DID that this year...
your reply...still sucks.
The Pulse comes out with their awards...rather than delve into the process and then back it up with bands that make your point, which of course would then allow for real debate on if those bands DO make your point, you come out with...
It sucks.
and you wonder why we have the same discussion year after year?
Thank you to those that pointed out the flaws and even the stuff the mags got right. If getting into the bands that belong on the lists, or are miscategorized, or hell, aren't even FROM or PLAY in the worcester area, never mind if they have even DONE anything in the past year (if in fact that is the time frame we are talking about, which for some reason neither mag ever states) is taboo, or off limits because it will create ill will among friends, or bands, or even web site readers then...
all these polls suck.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
Quote:
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
Well, Since I'm him, it would be reasonable to assume that Luke MacNeil is not the winner in the "Band that doesn't exist" category... I might just be a songwriter you've never heard before.
But I'm flattered, really.
The criteria to be nominated for the awards is... someone has to nominate you. Thankfully, ... enough people have to vote for you for the nomination before you can be considered a candidate, in this case, the top 4 nominated parties in each category move on to be finalists. The same person cannot vote twice, so you can't just sit at the computer and crank out votes.
.... And I don't think it's the physical award that people are competing for, it's the press. "Winner of the 2007 Worcester Music Awards" might not mean anything to you.. but to some booking agent in Minnesota, the guy (or girl) with that is going to get the gig before the guy with no press.
I love songwriting, and even moreso interpreting and sharing other old folk tunes, but this is also a business... and those of us that are serious about it, treat it as such. We're competing for the press which may or may not attract new fans, or make us more marketable in the future. Not for a metal plated microphone stuck in a piece of wood.
-Luke.
http://www.lukemacneil.com
http://www.myspace.com/lukemacneil
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
Thanks for posting Luke.
I think what the majority of the people that think that The Pulse awards are crap, are saying so because they want them to mean something to people HERE first then in Minnesota. That's what I am saying at least.
Saying things like "...guy (or girl) with that is going to get the gig before the guy with no press." sounds good, but I don't think that is true. In my experience thus far, your draw and if you are very lucky, the quality of your music will get you the gig, long before a Pulse Music Award will.
Best of luck in the awards. I hope you can parlay it into something great.
As a result of you posting which is a result of you being nominated I did check out your music as I am sure others will as well. So in that respect, The Pulse is exposing some music.
sort of.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
"Saying things like "...guy (or girl) with that is going to get the gig before the guy with no press." sounds good, but I don't think that is true. In my experience thus far, your draw and if you are very lucky, the quality of your music will get you the gig, long before a Pulse Music Award will... "
You are certainly correct. Your draw is the biggest asset that local venues are looking for.. When we're talking about out of state touring though... The press kit plays a very important role. And an award or two doesn't hurt it. It certainly doesn't make or break an artist.. just something to add to the list of accomplishments for a rising performer.
But I can see where you're coming from about locality.
I know the folks at Pulse, they're very nice, and no matter how much bashing you guys do, they really are making an attempt to do something for local artists. The reviewed my CD last year (Which does exist by the way) and were very kind. I even interviewed a band for them a while back, I went to their house, met with the members of the band, and tried to work with the band to the best of my ability to get their message out.... So don't just blindly knock these folks. They want ideas, and they want to be a publication that you want to read... If you have an idea to make it better, talk to them, write a letter to the editor, start writing your own reviews and sending them in.. forward your press releases... if you want it to be your paper, make it your paper.
I play at the Java Hut quite frequently, and I make it my goal each time I play there to try and get just one person to stop smoking or playing magic the gathering long enough to listen to one song. If I've done that, I consider it a good gig. The goal is not to sell cds, not to get mailing list entries... simply to get one person to pay attention for one song.
There's always those few lines in a song that catch people... and you can see from the stage when something hits someone.. when they stop for a second to think, or get choked up... those are the good gigs.
Some other venues have built in listening rooms. Every seat is silent and they are absorbing the material for a sheer love of music... That's a different deal entirely. Now, I've already got the attention of the room by default, my goal is to invoke some sort of emotion... and then sell records. Mostly I find at these types of gigs I learn more about the tunes that I'm playing from the audience.
I'm not knocking either type of venue, they're just very different. All of the worcester clubs I have played are the former... the goal is only to engage one audience member.
I'm glad you dug the tunes, and hopefully I'll see you around sometime. I'm also glad I stumbled upon this site, I'd have been active long ago had I known it was here.
-Luke
www.lukemacneil.com
www.myspace.com/lukemacneil
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
I don't recall anyone saying they weren't nice. We weren't bashing them as people. I was just commenting on the crapass awards.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
Quote:
to be clear, I didn't actually say I dug the tunes, I just checked them out. :lol: I hope to see you play live sometime also, be sure to post about your shows up here.
Quote:
Happy to have you here, we need more voices contributing to this place.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
Reason #2: When I was interviewed by them, they waited until the day before their deadline to contact me, then misquoted me a few times.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
I have to agree with Terrible Buddist here....I had no idea what specifically this thread was discussing until Katatonic posted the list
If there was a Worcester or Central Mass or even a New England Music Magazine would a readers poll/awards still be dumb?
How do you gage what people are paying attention to? I know thats one of the problems with Worcester but what do you suggest? Should there be no attempt at music awards until all the music venues in town sell out on a regular basis? Who gets to decide when why and how musicians in the area get to be recognized? At least Pulse and WoMag make an effort and by doing so maybe they get someone to pay attention in the process.
"Anything that you could ever want or be you already have and are"
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
Award for best complainer about awards
Award for guy with most awards who still complains about awards
Award for biggest loser
Award for demonstrating why awards suck
Award for suckiest band
Award for redundancy Award
Award for most bulletin board posts about awards
Award for being better than everyone who won awards
Award for pointing out an illegitimate nominee
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
Thanks, Tim. Put me down for #'s 3, 5 & 8.
I don't think your band is very good.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
I think Tim's awards have even less credibility than WoMag and Pulse, let's start a new thread about that.
Tim you like winning these things huh, don't want to say what you really think?
at the risk of being redundant to Tim but to also answer Cindy who isn't as aware of the complaints surrounding these awards, here is a thread from '05.This is before WoMag changed their system for selecting nominees. It has a lot of the stuff that is just getting brought up year after year. link
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
I write for the Pulse and I have no "documented" brain damage. But I do wait till the last minute to get my stories in...I work well under pressure.
What can I say, I enjoy writing, and it's a lot more fun than covering town meetings for the Telegram.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
there's a class of xinjiang province 3rd graders out of work for campaign incompetence. it's not like our name is lacking in r's.
http://www.myspace.com/preacherroe
12-5... the cantab, cambridge...charlie chesterman & the legendary motorbikes...silent service...eddie japan
1-23...sally o'brien's, somerville...golden west motor lodge...dearborn valley...the widowmakers
July 22-26...provincetown rocks festival
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
I think PULSE sucks because:
its a aimed at people that are not like me. Its aimed at college kids, (which i am not) and lacks relevence in any article, contest, award etc., .I think its just a way for somneone to get money from local Worc business' for ads. I like publications to have a purpose, a point, meaning.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
"Take out an advertisement for your next show in the Pulse Keith, tell me if you get more people to your show. Win an award, tell me if you get one CD sale or email from it. Yet these are the awards that we are suppose to be so flattered to receive?"
Word.
Advance high 5's and good games to all the winners.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
I think we know the main problem with both awards is that no one knows the what the criteria is to be nominated for a Turtle Boy, and that the ONLY criteria for the Pulse is that you can get a lot of people to vote for you, whether they know anything about you or your band at all.
And Duncan, even though we all know that these awards will not get a band any extra CD sales or any more people at shows, it is still nice to be recognized. I think it's why I get upset when I don't get nominated in Womag when 7 other chicks, most of whom I've never heard of, and one is a back up singer, get nominated. Yet, my band gets nominated for best metal (which we aren't) and the [other] band gets nominated a bunch of times too. I guess I don't get why my bands are qualified, but I am not. Like you said Duncan, those ommitted are "bad". So I am a "bad" singer, but my bands are "good". Confusing.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
Quote:
Amanda I think that saying that "no one knows the what the criteria is to be nominated for a Turtle Boy" is kind of silly. Seriously, it doesn't take much to figure out what the criteria might be. It's a music award, not the Nobel Prize. They have a panel of who they think are knowledgeable and engaged in the scene nominate who they think are the best. That's all. WoMag's awareness can come into question, their selections may be off, but I don't see a great conspiricy to cover up a criteria so that the real talent in Worcester can't win.
I went to look for the nominations to see what women you are referring to but I couldn't find them. I can't speak for WoMag but I think you are right in interpreting that by omitting a person or band from the nominations that they are making a statement. I think that is a good thing, not because I want people to be pissed off but because a reaction means that someone is paying attention.
It surprises me that you care so much about it, but it's good for WoMag that you do. It means that they are not entirely irrelevant.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
ok i looked back at that thread. Its too bad that these things are so ineffective. Apparently people in Worcester havent been paying attention for a long time. You can complain and dissect and re evaluate the awards over and over but until they actually are effective why even bother? You can't blame the magazine's if the public doesnt care enough to google your band after they saw it in print.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
Quote:
whoa whoa whoa! of course you can.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
Duncan(and anyone else) Let me ask a simple yes or know question. Should who ever Womag (or Pulse for that matter) has nominating CD's for local CD of the year, listen to every locally released CD before they vote on local CD of the year?
I know What I Like And I Like What I Know
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
"I don't see a great conspiricy to cover up a criteria so that the real talent in Worcester can't win."
I never said that, and I never implied that either. Obviously it's who they think are good. I'm guessing that's all that goes into it. I'm dropping that...
As for the other girls nominated....Dawn and Sunta Africa were the two I knew, and Cathy Cah is the backup singer. I didn't know the other people I think. I don't remember their names. Oh wait, maybe Lisa Marie....anyway. Whatever, I guess I shouldn't care, but it's hard not to take the omission personally. I know I shouldn't, but I do.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
Quote:
You should take it personally, those bastards at WoMag are saying you aren't the best in Worcester by your omission in their best of poll. It's up to you and the public to decide if a WoMag music poll means anything.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
I can't quote using this damn proxy server....
"It's up to you and the public to decide if a WoMag music poll means anything."
My omission does not cause LESS people to come to shows. So that's a plus.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
Quote:
Admittedly, I haven't seen any of Cathy Cah's recent musical endeavors, but she certainly has a history as a ripping lead singer. The first time I heard her sing a tune, I think I said "holy shit!"
Just because you or I might not be familiar with a name on a ballot doesn't automatically mean that they're not worthy. It may make you feel like you don't really know what's happening in this city. It's a different story when you ARE familiar with names on the list and either A) are of the opinion that they aren't very good, and/or B) are not as good, in your opinion, as other names that were not on the list.
So if you care enough to think about this for more than a minute, you're wondering if either the names that are on the lists are there out of politics, laziness, or because these artists are campaigning for the attention.
Just goes to show us how both small and large this scene really is....read on...
Quote:
In a perfect world, the answer is a resounding YES. Awards or no, there is nothing more basic or obvious than the idea that the local entertainment reporters should by all means listen to every local CD that is released. If that's what you're basing any of your biases about their respective awards on, then you should look at the issue that A) local musical acts need to get their music out to local press (seems like common sense to me) and B) local music press should be aware of what's going on in all facets of the music scene.
On one hand, this should be the most obvious and easy thing to accomplish. Worcester isn't that big of a city, and if there are a total of 5 or 6 journalists from mainstream press in charge of knowing what's going on, it should be as easy as can be. Right?
Obviously not.
On the other hand, Worcester's mainstream press, specifically the arts/music coverage, is notoriously overlooked, undervalued, underfunded, understaffed, and as a result deemed ineffectual and lame. For veteran reporters it's hard not to get lazy with regard to coverage of the local scene... Let's look in my inbox and see who has sent me their new CD and press kit... Oh, here's another email from so-and-so, and look at all the shows they're playing. I still haven't gone to see them, but they've got to be good, right?
These awards might be the local press' idea of giving notice to the local music scene that they can't devote more of their time and their advertisers' money on the rest of the year.
To people in the know, specifically the folks hanging out at a message board like this, the whole concept of these awards is transparent and it either bothers you because you feel insulted and disappointed by being excluded, included amongst others you don't feel belong, or because you just don't feel there's any credibility to any of it.
Then there is a slim chance that someone who has less of a clue than what many accuse the local press itself of having, might read through the polls and just file away a name because it's familiar and deemed good enough to be on a poll.
That is where folks like Duncan have a point that it's frustrating that these polls/awards may not reflect what one might consider truly great in this city, in favor for mediocre squeaky wheels who work their email lists like crazy.
But adding to that very point, is my feeling that the list of "regular folks" who read these polls and glean anything from them that lasts is probably more minuscule than the editors fear.
So in the grand scheme of things, we're left pondering whether or not they should even bother with polls or awards at all. Some might say they shouldn't. It's pointless. Give up. You're dead.
It appears that Womag took some of that kind of criticism to heart in the last few years, asking for outside help, admitting that their internal reporters might not know everything that is going on in this city, and getting a list of worthy names to put on the ballot from people who they felt had a better connection to what was really going on. That's a step in the right direction because it shows that they're trying to offer a better awards poll than they have. The fact that they approached outside help at all shows that they're at least interested in doing a better job with these awards polls. Granted, one or two years of intention is not going to undo a decade of bad reputation, but in my opinion, at least they're giving themselves an opportunity to be credible someday.
Speaking personally, I can't say that I'm either bothered with or satisfied with either the Turtle Boys or the Pulse awards. I certainly have opinions about both of their choices and methods, but the bottom line for me is that I'd rather think about something else than to get worked up. (My novella here might say otherwise, but...)
So while I'm adding to the pollution, I'll just say that these awards, this debate, and my perspective on the local scene tells me something about myself, and myself only. It tells me that there is music being made well below the radar that is incredible and I need to stay open to finding out about it, be it from polls, friends, websites and hell, seeing them play. It tells me that I'm guilty of being lazy and jaded about the local scene, and before I start bitching about others not going out to see shows, I need to bitch at myself. It tells me that the cutting edge has moved on, and if I want to stay anywhere near it, I need to look elsewhere for information. With the immediacy of the internet replacing reading weekly papers or listening to the radio to find out about music that moves me, there's just no competition. I can't even begin to scratch the surface of great music that's out there. Every day I find something new or old. Maybe they're from Greenland, and not Green Street, but the fact is that they could just as easily be from Green Street for all I know. If it wasn't for Duncan telling me about Walter the Orange Ocean, a Worcester band that deserves your attention, I'm not sure I would have ever found out about them. Thank you word of mouth. Thank you Musicblogs (how late am I at finding this endless supply of great musical information?). Thank you internet radio. Thank you mix CDs. Thank you Myspace. Thank you India. Thank you Alanis.
I'm going to go about my business now. I'll try to spend at least part of my day helping to make the music scene that I love and love to be a part of, better. Just as Duncan does by doing many things, not the least of which was creating this website for us to exchange our thoughts on. Just as Amanda does by caring about the music scene and doing her part to create the best music she knows how to so some of us might enjoy it. Just as Pez does by playing in many great bands, not to mention being in Huxley, who made some of greatest music I've ever heard. Just as Keith does by always having something to say about the music scene to incite debate and discussion like that that might actually affect something somewhere. Just like Linnea does by not being in a band, yet going to clubs and paying attention to threads like this, showing that she has an opinion even if she isn't in a band. Just like Barry, who might be a pain in the ass, who if no one else ever knows, did more to help recharge Worcester's musical batteries throughout the 90's than almost anyone I can think of.
If you read this far, you need more work to do.
If I wrote this much, I guess I do too.
Roger
P.S.
If you think that someone was sorely missing from these polls, now is a great opportunity to spread the word about them.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
I can't quote either, so:
Terrible buddhist
made a commetn about Simon-Cowell type-criticism for these awards. That reminded me of American Idol and an article I read last week about the fact that last years winner sold fewer c.d's than any of his predecessors while a runner up sold over 1 million and blew him out of the water. This is another example of how the whole 'reader poll' concept can go wrong. The most popular isnt always the most talented (cough)dubya!(cough)
Katatonic and PEZ:
Emily Grogan is extrmemly talented, but NOT from Worcester, she's from Boston, so I don't think she belings in this either.
PEZ
HDATZ is an acoustic blue grass band....does that make them a 'Hippy band'? I dont know?? What exactly IS a hippy band anyway??
Uncle Billy's isnt a 'jam band' They pride themselves on writing new songs in a classic rock stlye.....does that make them a hippy band? (hippy band should be a category....)
For a quick education on local jazz listen to WICN 2 hours a day for 2 months and you should get up to speed
Solo act vs. singer song writer: I'm assuming solo act can be a cover act while singer song writer would be someone who performs their own material.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
If Hot Day At The Zoo are a bluegrass act, then I was wrong in my assumptions about them, which were based on the bills I've seen their name appear on, and the people I know who follow them.
I'd certainly call Uncle Billy's Smokehouse a "jam" band, as they are prone to playing extended improv jams in the middle of their songs. And if their goal is to get their name out to a demographic who would enjoy watching a band play extended improv jams in the middle of their songs, then I would say that is the proper category for them to be nominated.
RE: the "Solo Act" vs. "Singer-Songwriter" issue. They need to trim these categories down, for real. See below.
This poll has the same probem as the WoMag awards, in that there's just too goddamn many categories. Narrow the scope down a bit, and nominate the real cream of the crop. None of this "let's-have-a-million-categories-so-we-have-room-for-everybody-and-his-fucking-brother" nonsense.
Best Rock/Pop Act
Best Indie/Alternative Act
Best Improv/Jam Act
Best Hip-Hop Act
Best Metal/Hardcore Act
Best Electronic/Experimental Act
Best Jazz Act
Best New Band
Best Cover Band
Best Singer-Songwriter/Solo Act
Best Male Vocalist (and mention what the hell BAND they're in)
Best Female Vocalist (same thing here)
Best Club DJ
Best Dance Club
Best Live Music Club
Best Live Act
You see, my band probably wouldn't get nominated for any of these categories, strictly because the competition would be too stiff. And I'd be fine with that.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
It seems to me that every prolonged thread about the local music scene always mentions the lack of attendance at shows and that the general public just doesnt care. Do each of you think that overhauling WoMag and Pulse are the answer to that problem? Does Worcester's Cultural Relevancy rest solely on thier shoulders? Of course not. This website wouldn't exist if it WoMag and Pulse were the only answer.
Other than overhauling MoMag and Pulse what other ideas does everyone have about sharing Worcester's Cultural Relevancy with the Worcester Masses that we think "just don't care"?
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
Pez, this is Amanda from Standard Deviation, so ya, it's that Amanda.
Roger, I know that Cathy can sing extremely well. I heard her do something at a Green Street and was blown away. I am unsure how often her band played last year, but I am pretty sure she doesn't sing for that band. That's all I'm saying. Shouldn't someone nominated actually sing for a band? Otherwise, I have a bunch of students here at school that sing better than any front-person in any band, know what I mean? I also mentioned earlier that just because I haven't heard of someone doesn't mean they shouldn't be nominated. I am definitely not the most up to date person for all music in Worcester. But I will say that I take the time to look up a these people to find out who they are, and rarely get any good info from Google or anything. Why can't every damn band just get a MySpace....
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
Amanda
(I just friend requested you) and found standard deviation on myspace as well as more than half of those nominee's. I also noticed (to my embarassment) that im already friends with some of them but had never bothered listening to them
Wirrly
hmmm, brianwashing high school kids....assainating every sinlge muscian not from Worcester.... get stickers that say: GO SEE WORCESTER LOCAL MUSIC and stick em on our asses......
i kid i kid.....
if any of us knew how to get people into clubs, we'd be fucking rich! and most likely go somewhere else.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
I find that very weird to read. It's a primary function of media to showcase and direct culture, not just report on pumpkin carving contests. That’s the whole point.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
no one ever actually answers my questions
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
Ok, I’ll answer anyways. I’ll print 200,000 flyers for Tim Hansons next show, you hand deliver them to everyone in Worcester. Let us know how that works out.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
What time do you go on? I don't think anyone else on that list was nominated so I don't care if I see them.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
Who knows?
We can't really talk about what SHOULD be done, when we don't know what WAS done?
Ok, thats not true. I said it before, and I will restate myself, (damn I need some more coffee, or Liam to sleep through the damned night) a band that has not played more than the number of fingers I have on my left hand in a year, nor released a cd in that time span, should not be eligable for an award, if those awards are panel based.
I think there is room for 2 types of awards in this city...one is obviously popularity based, you rally your fans, friends, grandmothers, and who ever else has a 'pulse' and get them to vote for you. Its very American Idolish and doesn't mean you are getting the best bands as listened to by a 'critical audience'. Perhaps there should be some sort of simon cowell panel to weed out a band that has really not been in the scene or REALLY sucks or what have you, but realistically, its up to the people.
The other type of award, which I personally would put more credence to, but that doesn't make it 'better', would be the critical choice, like what WoMag tried to do. To do this correctly however takes real criteria and people that are out there actually seeing the bands and listening to the cds. I think they got part of that right this year. The short of it is, YES, they should be going to shows, YES, they should be listening to cds, YES it should be something that bands should submit their work to.
and now for the BUT. Who is going to do it? I commend Gabe for taking the initiative to do his weekend reviews. That is the kind of stuff that makes me say, boy I want to check out that band next time I have a chance, or boy, you know what there is a lot of good music in our scene right now, its good to see it getting noticed. This is also the kind of thing that SHOULD be in Womag and provide a starting point at the end of a year for these awards.
I also commend the one songs reviews. Again, that kind of critical analysis of songs gets debate going, it makes people want to listen so that they can offer their views, and its also good for the bands so THEY can get an idea of what others perception is and decide to take it to heart or say...fuck them, they don't 'get' me :)
Duncan has been trying to nail the idea of the process into my thick skull for a while, and I agree with him, the process seems to be broken. The part where I disagree is, with out delving into what they got right and what they got wrong, you can't really decide how or why. If I say, man, I don't get how Lusting Kay was left off the best local band ever list, the answer then becomes, well, your guitar player can't play a lick, you have only been around for a few years, have one demo cd to your credit which you released a year and a half ago, and played all of 7 shows last year. So there you have reasons the band does not belong on a list...from there, BUT Huck should be on that list, they have released like 4 cds in the past 4 years, they play to a packed house every weekend, and paul is just so cute. Now you have criteria by which you are judging and can even debate with people how to vote. Novel idea, no? Of course, its all conjecture if we don't know what the shaddowy figures had for criteria when nominating people and bands for awards.
ok, more coffee time.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
I can't blame local media for lack of cultural relevancy? What a bunch of pedestrians we've become. Rock on!
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
yes.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
“Here Is Why I Call Bullshit.” By PEZ.
Best Blues/R&B: The only one I’ve seen is Jason James. Seen him a bunch of times, and I’ve never really felt one way about him, or the other. Maybe he’s the best Worcester has to offer, but I don’t know. I wouldn’t be terribly surprised if he was in the top 4, though.
Best CD: I haven’t heard any of them. The only one of these bands I’ve even seen is Trebek. But I just heard Walter the Orange Ocean’s disc, and I find it really hard to believe that it’s not at least in the top four. But Almada are in the WBCN Rumble this year, so they must be doing something right. Are they actually a Worcester band, though?
Best Singer-Songwriter Act: I’ve only heard Jediah. He’s good. Never even heard of the other dudes.
Best Club DJ: I’m only familiar w/ Shame, but he’s impressive enough to get my vote any day of the week. My ex-girlfriend swore by Kid Optimus, but I’ve never heard him.
Best Country/Americana Act: I only know the Bees Knees. They’re pretty good at what they do, I guess. I certainly couldn’t fault anyone else for liking them. Three Day Threshold aren't from here. Maybe I'm wrong, but I always thought Hot Day At The Zoo were supposed to be a hippy band.
Best Cover Band: People probably want to bitch about this category even being here, but I understand the need for it, because it’s what a lot of people want to see, when they go out. The only one I’ve seen is White Chocolate. They’re a lot of fun, but with the exception of Ed Barnett, I don’t think I’d consider them the “best” at anything.
Best Dance Venue: Wait a minute… isn’t Rehab in Irish Times? Seriously, what the fuck?
Best Female Vocalist: I just assumed Amanda Lirange was Amanda from Standard Deviation. Is that not the case? Emily Grogan’s not from here, so far as I know.
Best Hardcore Act: I saw Wreckoning, and thought they were pretty good, but Sullivan still needs to find a band that he won’t totally overshadow. Gabe & I found a Hated CD lying in the street one time. We listened to it. We laughed at them.
Best Jam & Groove Act: I’ve actually seen 3 of these bands. White Chocolate belongs in the cover band category. Uncle Billy’s are really good at what they do. Hint of Lime are fucking boring as shit.
Best Jazz Act: I’m totally lost, here. I was always down with the Sonic Explorers. Don’t know anything else about local jazz, which I kinda feel bad about.
Best Live Act: This category should be strictly reserved for bands you go see, because you know goddamned well you’re going to have a good fucking time. There is no way in hell OSB are one of the best live bands in town. Seriously. I don’t even think they’re a bad band, necessarily, but there is absolutely nothing special about them, as a live act. And we played with Trebek one time, and I didn’t feel one way or the other about them. There is still nothing in this town that will compare to a live Balls or Deadites show, both of which are conspicuously absent from this list.
Best Live Venue: No real problems here. I don’t go to shows at Irish Times, but I’m sure there are people who enjoy it.
Best Male Vocalist: Tim Hansen is my personal favorite in town, but the fact that Jediah isn’t nominated is completely fucking retarded. Who are these other guys? Maybe I’ve seen their bands, but don’t know their names.
Best Metal Act: I think Craig is a really great singer & front-man. Skulltoboggan doesn’t do much for me, but they probably at least deserve a nomination. Wreckoning is in the hardcore category... Keep them there. I can’t speak for the others.
Best Up and Comers Act: I’ve seen absolutely none of these bands. Maybe some of them are pretty good. Even so, I’d have a really hard time believing any of them are better than Hey Now Morris Fader. It’s criminal to not see them get any kind of acknowledgement. And what about Walter the Orange Ocean? Are they new, within the last year?
Best Pop Act: I can’t say I have a problem with this category at all. Jediah & OSB are pretty vanilla for my tastes, but these are all good pop bands.
Best Punk Act: The Numbskulls are some of my favorite people on Earth. They’ve got some really good songs, and I enjoy seeing them. I don’t really think they’re one of the “best” punk bands I’ve ever seen, but they at least deserve a nomination. The Balls are pure awesomeness. I know nothing of these other jokers.
Best Radio DJ: Is Capt. PJ the only actual local DJ listed here? Who’s Mike Hsu? Maybe he’s from here. Regardless, this category is bullshit. (And I really like Carmelita.)
Best Rap/Hip-Hop Act: I don’t even know where to go for good hip-hop in this town. But Nytmare is fucking awesome, and even though I’ve never seen any of the dudes on this list, I’m sure he’s better than at least one of them.
Best Rock Act: Call me an asshole, but I’m pretty sure Gutta is better than at least one of these bands. And Thinner are too, and so are the Black. If I’m wrong on all counts, then the current state of the scene is way better than I give it credit for.
Best Solo Act: I don’t know any of these guys except for Jediah. I also don’t know what the difference is between a "solo" act, and a "singer-songwriter" act, for the purpose of this list.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
Roger, thanks for that. I appreciate the time and thought that went into that post, as well as the honest and humble look at human nature.
All done with nice.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
flyers....
been there done that. it gets about a 2% responce if your lucky.
As far as the local media outlets go...I have gotten plenty of responce to coverage I've had in the Telegram and Gazette.
I still think there's an answer to my non existant problem. I'm leaving for Lala land to look for it. Be back in 20.
Re: It may be stating the obvious....
Whirrly, I actually have lost track of what your question/problem was. Care to repeat? Maybe someone can answer.