This blows my mind..... would you text a vote in for someone to get a kidney? what would you base it on? |
Politicians from across the spectrum are disgusted, but still struggling to find anything illegal in it. Less edifying than the breast-beating is the fake justification of the programme makers that this "highlights the problem of organ-donorship" and could thereby save lives. This is post-rationalisation of the most cynical kind. You can put up with a lot from Endemol, under the cloak of post-modernism, but to see it parade itself as a force for social good does makes one feel a little queasy.
Stranger still is the spectacle of Dutch MEP Dorette Corbey, who I'm sure isn't in the pay of the company, justifying the show on the basis that one of the founders of Endemol died of kidney disease five years ago, and it's a tribute to his memory. Well, it's what he would've wanted... Bad enough to suffer an untimely death, imagine if you couldn't posthumously spin some cash out of it.
TV is interesting because it's ethically lawless. You can have all the self-regulation in the world, and it won't change the fact that this industry was born of an age we proudly call post-ideological, and understands nothing but money. More old-fashioned worlds like medicine, which still do interrogate themselves philosophically, are no match for this kind of delinquency.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0,,2091008,00.html
Outcry over TV kidney competition | |||
Political parties have called for The Big Donor Show to be scrapped, but broadcaster BNN says it will highlight the country's shortage of organ donors. "It's a crazy idea," said Joop Atsma, of the ruling Christian Democrat Party. "It can't be possible that, in the Netherlands, people vote about who's getting a kidney," he told the BBC. The programme, from Big Brother creators Endemol, is due to be screened on Friday night. 'Totally unacceptable'
Viewers will also be able to send in their advice by text message during the 80-minute show. The Dutch donor authority has condemned the show, as have kidney specialists in the UK. "The scenario portrayed in this programme is ethically totally unacceptable," said Professor John Feehally, who has just ended his term as president of the UK's Renal Association. "The show will not further understanding of transplants," he added. "Instead it will cause confusion and anxiety." Professor Feehally also pointed out that, under normal circumstances, two people would benefit from a donor, each receiving one kidney. "The set up of the programme bears no relationship to the way decisions are made about transplants in the real world," he said. "Living donors can choose altruistically to give one of their kidneys - usually to a family member. "If organs become available after someone dies, health professionals with access to detailed information about those waiting for a transplant make objective decisions about who should receive those particular kidneys." 'Shocking'
"The chance for a kidney for the contestants is 33%," said the station's current chairman, Laurens Drillich. "This is much higher than that for people on a waiting list." "We think that is disastrous, so we are acting in a shocking way to bring attention to this problem." "For years and years we have had problems in the Netherlands with organ donations and especially kidney donations," agreed Alexander Pechtold of D-66, the Dutch social liberal party. "You can have a discussion about if this is distasteful, but finally we have a public debate," he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme. TV critics in the UK have expressed horror at the programme, but said such a show would be unlikely in Britain. "My first reaction, probably everyone's reaction, is that this is as dangerously near as we've got to a TV programme playing God," said Julia Raeside of the Guardian newspaper. "People may live or die on the result of a game show. It's a step too far. "I don't think this is anything to do with reality TV. It's just a crazy idea that would never play out over here." The outcry comes at a difficult time for production company Endemol, who were censured by Ofcom last week for their handling of the Celebrity Big Brother racism row. The Australian version of Big Brother has also drawn criticism for not telling a contestant that her father had died. | |||
HAVE YOUR SAY Steve Davies, Romford, UK |
"Anything that you could ever want or be you already have and are"
Re: Big Donor SHow
not sure how to get that video to play in the forum so here is a link to it
http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/avdb/news/entertainment/video/97000/nb/97162_16x9_nb.asx
Re: Big Donor SHow
Wow.
Re: Big Donor SHow
I heard Jordan Levy talking about this on his show yesterday. This is outlandish.
Re: Big Donor SHow
At least the decision isnt based on a popularity vote BUT I imagine that the woman; after interviewing each recipiants family and history; will regret putting herself in this situation. How does that help you chose- oh this person gets the organ cuz their family loves them more - of course each of their famlies and friends love them - they are freakin dying!
I was recently enlightened on some of the guidelines for becoming an organ recipient and it was really hard to hear that there is an age limit. Just being a few months or even a year off from being eligible is heartbreaking....can you imagine not being chosen based on your personality and family. Its so messed up.
I was in a GREAT mood yesturday- singing along to "yesturday once more" with the cooks- until I turned on CNN. Between this and the Dog fighting ring http://www.wsbtv.com/news/13413855/detail.html I became completel disgusted with the news.
Is there any positive news floating around? please share i would love to hear it.
Re: Big Donor SHow
It's fake
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/6714063.stm
Re: Big Donor SHow
Doug Nanaimo wrote: "That anyone believed that this was real shows how horrible, tasteless and puerile most television programming has become."
Re: Big Donor SHow
fake or not did the public still text in their votes?